
The “social media purge” is a perfect example of this, and the censorship of speech is only going to become more widespread as time goes on. The next generation of “America’s thought police” is rising, and they intend to make sure that the future belongs to the politically correct.We are quickly entering an age where people are afraid of saying anything that might be controversial or could possibly "offend" someone -- and where virtually everything is offensive to someone. This is a real danger to our society for an array of reasons but perhaps most notably: A world where people are afraid to speak up is a world where tyranny is not far away. Regardless of the reason for thought suppression, it cannot and will not lead us, as a nation, anywhere worth going.
The founding fathers put free speech into the Constitution as a way to protect the disenfranchised and to protect individual citizens from the power of government. The spirit of free speech is to protect the suppressed, not to protect a free-for-all where anything is acceptable, no matter how hateful and damaging.They go on to state that they do believe "hostility may be warranted" towards those who have been given "a chance to learn" and "refuse to adapt their beliefs." The students write further:
If people continue to support racist politicians or pay for speakers that prop up speech that will lead to the harm of others, then it is critical to take the appropriate measures to hold them accountable for their actions. It is important to note that our preference for education over beration regards students who may have not been given the chance to learn. Rather, we are not referring to those who have already had the incentive to learn and should have taken the opportunities to do so. Paid professional lecturers and politicians are among those who should know better.In other words, these liberal students feel that if you are "given a chance" to adopt their preferred political ideals, and refuse, any "beration" you receive from them is deserved. And of course, only liberals get to decide what speech is "hateful," and that generally means conservative speech of any sort.
Many “journalists” today are just tattletale thought police
By Ethan Huff // Share
“There will be war” if China and US do not immediately stabilize relations, warns Chinese scholar
By Arsenio Toledo // Share
MAGA blood libel: Why are they hiding the medical report?
By News Editors // Share
Pezeshkian: Iran's New Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei is Healthy and Able to Govern
By garrisonvance // Share
Op-Ed Alleges U.K. Establishment Campaign to Prepare Public for War With Russia
By garrisonvance // Share
10-Year Treasury Yield Hits 19-Year High as Oil, Inflation and Fed Comments Drive Spike
By sterlingashworth // Share
Anthropic CEO Amodei: Poorly Managed AI Could Pose "Risk to Humanity"
By chasecodewell // Share
Australian PM: OpenAI Agent Accessed Country's Medicare Portal
By edisonreed // Share
Meta Tests Human Concierge for Muse AI Assistant, Internal Posts Show
By chasecodewell // Share