NYT editorial argues that extinction of the human race would be good for planet Earth
By victoriab // 2019-01-07
Copy
 
The mainstream media is now trying to "normalize" the depopulation agenda. In a recent NYT editorial, Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?, Clemson University professor Todd May argues that the end of humanity wouldn't be so bad after all. The left-wing has been using the global warming narrative to conjure up fear about imminent human extinction for years now, but declaring that the end of humanity would be good for the planet is taking the global depopulation agenda to a whole new level. It would seem that the left-wing media is now launching the next phase of this grand extinction scheme. By publishing the opinion of Mr. Todd May, The New York Times is at the very least showing that this point of view is worthy of such a lofty platform, if not a full-blown endorsement. As Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, recently reported, there are many, many signs that the "extermination agenda" has already begun -- and with headlines like Mays' NYT piece floating around, it's clear that the media is trying to push depopulation as the new "normal." What starts off as a "fringe" idea can very quickly become mainstream thought, if its publicized the right way. And it looks like the globalist Left is moving towards adopting depopulation as the next big thing on the party line.

NYT editorial says human extinction is "good"

In a recent opinion piece for the Times, Mr. Todd Mays states, "Human beings are destroying large parts of the inhabitable earth and causing unimaginable suffering to many of the animals that inhabit it." He notes that humans are destroying the Earth through at least three different means: Factory farming and animal suffering, climate change, and an increasing human population. None of these things are going away any time soon, Mays contends.

"Humanity, then, is the source of devastation of the lives of conscious animals on a scale that is difficult to comprehend," the chemistry professor states.

Throughout the article, Mays compares and contrasts the sins of humanity against the greatness our species has also managed to achieve, asking if the things some select humans have accomplished have been worth the price our planet has been forced to pay. While Mays does not come to an official conclusion on the matter, he does state, "It may well be, then, that the extinction of humanity would make the world better off and yet would be a tragedy."

Advancing the depopulation agenda

As writer Michael Snyder notes, Mays' arguments also seem to insinuate that only cultures which have contributed something worthwhile are worth preserving. While other academics have pointed to population control or population reduction, Mays is jumping straight to total extinction. In a recent article, Mike Adams, founder of Natural News and creator of Brighteon.com, revealed that many of the events happening in our world today are tied to one ultimate cause: Ending humanity. Adams writes:
Inescapably, a core feature of everything happening today is an anti-human agenda to exterminate humankind. Every major trend taking place today is preparing humankind for a mass extermination event, making sure humans cannot fight back, think for themselves or even reproduce. 
Adams points to the aggressive calls to disarm citizens, cultural attacks on fertility and masculinity, poisoning of the food supply and other key issues as signs that there is a plan to take down the human race -- and it's already been put into action. You can see more coverage of the globalist agenda at Depopulation.news. Sources for this article include: InfoWars.com NYTimes.com
Copy