The first, he suggested, was reviewing Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which Cruz argued effectively grants platforms a “special immunity from liability” for the content they allow, predicated on the assumption that they are “neutral public forums” rather than publishers exercising subjective preferences. “If Big Tech wants to be partisan and political speakers it has that right, but it has no entitlement to a special immunity from liability under Section 230 that The New York Times doesn’t enjoy, that The Washington Post doesn’t enjoy, that nobody else enjoys except for Big Tech,” Cruz noted.Read more at: BigLeaguePolitics.com
Twitter waging censorship warfare against corporations that supported Trump
By Ethan Huff // Share
Many “journalists” today are just tattletale thought police
By Ethan Huff // Share
Under Biden, military being purged of all conservatives
By Ethan Huff // Share
Pandemic widens gap between rich and poor, analysis shows
By Nolan Barton // Share
This is amazing: Here are NINE Democrats who would fail the Marjorie Taylor Green committee test
By News Editors // Share
Canada warns LGBT travelers of U.S. scrutiny over passport gender rules
By isabelle // Share
Chicago judge issues landmark ruling challenging century-old bullet forensics
By ramontomeydw // Share
The 10,000-step myth: How a marketing gimmick shaped global health for decades
By avagrace // Share