WSJ says covid came from a Wuhan lab, citing the genetic fingerprint of the virus
By ethanh // 2021-06-08
Copy
 
One by one, mainstream media outlets everywhere are nodding in agreement that the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) may have come from a laboratory after all, the latest being the Wall Street Journal. Writers Steve Quay and Richard Muller reported that the Biden regime has suddenly switched course and is now asking the intelligence community to look more closely into the theory that the Chinese Virus may have "leaked" from a laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology rather than emerged naturally at a Wuhan wet market. For much of 2020, the media denied the lab origin theory, calling it a wild "conspiracy theory" and banning all talk of it on platforms like Facebook and Twitter. In recent weeks, however, the narrative has shifted and suddenly even Anthony Fauci says that the Wuhan Flu might have originated in a lab. We know that Fauci was secretly funding illegal gain of function research at the WIV, where scientists were being paid to genetically modify bat coronaviruses to create bioweapons. Once this became public, Fauci's tune about the Chinese Virus changed dramatically. Now, the media is blaming "amateur sleuths" for blowing the lid on the scandal, the details of which become more disturbing by the day. Certain "fingerprints" inside the Wuhan Flu point to manipulation, the "experts" now admit, which suggest the virus did not just randomly transfer from bats to humans by chance.

The Chinese Virus could not have emerged naturally

It would take something like gain of function technology to make a bat coronavirus transmissible into humans – either that or the virus was injected through vaccines. There is no other way for a bat coronavirus to naturally pass from animal to person. The "spike" protein in particular, which is used in the Chinese Virus injections they are calling "vaccines," bear certain trademarks that point to the whole thing being engineered rather than a random occurrence. "Since 1992 there have been at least 11 separate experiments adding a special sequence to the same location," the WSJ reports about these spike proteins and their artificial insertion into bat coronaviruses. "The end result has always been supercharged viruses." The mRNA injections from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna program a person's DNA to manufacture spike proteins inherently, while the injections from Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and AstraZeneca actually contain spike proteins right in the syringe. Both types of shots will ultimately lead to injury and / or death, but the latter seem to be bringing about the doom a lot sooner for some people. Those receiving the mRNA shots could see their bodies develop AIDS-like autoimmune disease months down the road. Further evidence of the Wuhan Flu being tampered with was present in a February 2020 paper published by WIV lab worker Shi Zhengli, which omitted any mention of the special sequences that were inserted into the virus to "supercharge" it. These sequences are easily identified in the data that accompanied the paper, but not in the paper itself. Why was this important information omitted, and did they really think that nobody would notice the disparity? There is also a dramatic difference between the genetic diversity of the Chinese Virus compared to earlier iterations of it like SARS and MERS. The latter two were deemed to be of natural origin, but the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) was found to behave much differently. "Science knows of only one way that could be achieved: simulated natural evolution, growing the virus on human cells until the optimum is achieved. That is precisely what is done in gain-of-function research," the WSJ reveals. More up-to-the-minute news about the Chinese Virus can be found at Pandemic.news. Sources for this article include: Archive.fo NaturalNews.com NaturalNews.com Brighteon.com
Copy