
News of Valentino’s inclusion sparked outrage on social media, and some are claiming they were censored for criticizing Valentino’s involvement in the match.
‘“I’m back after being locked out of my account since August 5 for ‘hateful conduct,’” one user wrote on Twitter.
“Let me say upfront. I DISAGREE. I called a man a man. Where’s the hate?”
Speaking to FEMAIL, another woman who was suspended said: “I think it is preposterous. Twitter clearly has its own agenda and considers this to be hate speech. Utterly bonkers.
“Seemingly many individuals have had their accounts locked or suspended by merely pointing out a scientific truth.”
Women’s Right Network’s Heather Binning said: “The women who have been suspended from Twitter are the latest in a long line of women – and some men – who have been banned from the social media platform for stating the truth.
“Of course, no one should abuse others on social media. But Twitter – and other sites – is colluding in the lie about biological facts. We have known people banned for ‘misgendering’, calling a man a ‘man’ or using ‘he’ or ‘him’ pronouns. And I’m afraid that it seems women – and particularly lesbians – who speak out on these issues are most vulnerable.
“It’s no wonder the hashtag #twitterhateswomen is regularly trending.”
Read more at: ReclaimTheNet.org
Erin go Britain? Ireland considers enacting a bill criminalizing the possession of hateful material
By News Editors // Share
By News Editors // Share
By News Editors // Share
Trump's Iran gamble: A battlefield win Americans could pay for at home
By isabelle // Share
India's climate paradox: Forced to grow green while history's polluters look on
By willowt // Share
New York State Lost $10.7 Billion in Tax Revenue as Millionaire Population Declined, Report Says
By sterlingashworth // Share
Exercise Rewires Heart's Nerve Network, Study Finds
By morganverity // Share
Inflammatory Diet Linked to Higher Body Weight, Meta-Analysis Finds
By cocosomers // Share