Hope Accord reaches nearly 3,000 signatures calling for immediate BAN on COVID jabs
By ethanh // 2024-07-15
Copy
 
We are pleased to report that since its unveiling, a statement called the Hope Accord that calls for an "immediate" ban on all mRNA (modRNA) Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) "vaccines" in the United States now has nearly 3,000 signatures from doctors, scientists and academics. All in all, more than 33,000 people have signed the Hope Accord, the other 30,000 being people like you who have done your homework on the injections and determined them to be a public health menace. According to Slay News, all of the nearly 3,000 professional signature endorsements were verified to ensure they came from legitimate experts. Among the most notable signatories are diagnostic pathologist Dr. Clare Craig; physician and renowned British cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra; and evolutionary biologist and podcaster Prof. Bret Weinstein. "A growing body of evidence suggests that the widespread rollout of the novel Covid-19 mRNA vaccine products is contributing to an alarming rise in disability and excess deaths," the statement reads. "The association observed between the vaccine rollout and these concerning trends is now supported by additional significant findings." "These include the discovery of plausible biological mechanisms of harm demonstrated in laboratory and autopsy studies, as well as high rates of adverse events seen in randomized clinical trials and national surveillance programs. Altogether, these observations indicate a causal link." (Related: Did you know that COVID injections cause 723 times more brain clots than seasonal flu shots?)

There's no COVID emergency, so why are the jabs still on the market?

From the beginning, we were told that COVID injections were necessary to address a pressing public health "emergency" caused by a "virus" from China. Later on, that emergency was deemed to be over – and has been over for several years now. Since COVID injections never went through the proper regulatory approval channels, but were instead rushed to market through Operation Warp Speed, they are no longer protected under emergency use authorization (EUA). This means it is time for them to be pulled from the market, especially now that we know how much harm they cause to human health. "Going forward, the burden of proof falls on those still advocating for these products to compellingly demonstrate that they aren't resulting in net harm," the Hope Accord explains. "Until such evidence is presented, regulators should suspend their use as a matter of standard medical precaution." "Fundamental and cherished principles of medical ethics were disregarded. These included: 'first do no harm,' informed consent, bodily autonomy and the notion that adults protect children – not the other way around. Also, particularly concerning was the erosion of free speech – a democratic principle that underpinned the ability to question untested interventions whilst ensuring other principles were upheld." The only way to stop this runaway train is for the medical profession at large to eat that humble pie and admit it was wrong to push the shots, especially on young people who bore the brunt of the harm they caused. Hope Accord signatories want there to be an immediate investigation into the root causes of what led pretty much the entire medical profession to adopt a groupthink attitude concerning these medical experiments, which were pushed on the masses as a condition of schooling, employment and in some cases, entry into local businesses. "An honest and thorough investigation is needed, addressing the root causes that have led us to this place, including institutional groupthink, conflicts of interest, and the suppression of scientific debate," the letter concludes. "We ultimately seek a renewed commitment to the core principles of ethical medicine, returning to an era in which we strive for transparency, accountability, and responsible decision-making throughout the spheres of medicine and public health." Learn more about the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccines at BadMedicine.news. Sources for this article include: SlayNews.com NaturalNews.com
Copy