"Sudden death" COVID vaccine paper published, then censored, by The Lancet now republished with peer review
By ethanh // 2024-11-19
Copy
 
A two-year-old paper exposing Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) "vaccines" that the medical establishment would not allow to be published has finally made its way into the peer-reviewed journal Science, Public Health Policy and the Law. It has been a long time coming for the so-called "sudden death" COVID jab autopsy paper to see the light of day. The Lancet and another Elsevier journal censored it when it first came out during the "pandemic," but now the public can see its contents for the first time. "This has never been seen in scientific publishing before!" tweeted Dr. William Makis, MD, about the paper. (Related: Have you checked out our earlier report about the censored Lancet paper, which found that 74 percent of post-COVID injection deaths are, in fact, caused by the jabs?)

"We got them, finally!!" celebrates Dr. Makis

For the research, scientists looked at 325 autopsies from people who had recently gotten jabbed for COVID and who "died suddenly" not long after. This is the largest such autopsy series in the world, by the way. Scientists discovered that it took an average of about two weeks from the time a person gets jabbed to the time they get loaded up into the freezer drawers at the coroner's office. "73.9% of deaths were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 Vaccination," the paper explains. Keep in mind that the two-week average is just an average. Some COVID jab recipients died almost immediately after the syringe contents were dispensed into their arms. Dr. Peter McCullough and McCullough Foundation epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, are credited with making major contributions to the new research, which blows the lid on the COVID jab scam. "This is a monumental achievement in the face of historically unprecedented scientific censorship," Dr. Makis says. "Yes, COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines cause SUDDEN DEATH and most are within the first 2 weeks – that's why they were labeled UNVACCINATED." What Dr. Makis is referring to, of course, were the screwy ways that government authorities decided to tabulate COVID jab deaths. If someone got jabbed and subsequently died within the first two weeks, he or she was labeled as "unvaccinated" on official documents, making it seem like far fewer fully vaccinated people died from the shots. "This paper proves WHY THEY DID IT," Dr. Makis contends. "They hid the deaths. But we got them!! Finally!!" The next thing on the docket is to hold The Lancet and Elsevier accountable for hiding the dirty truth about these shots from the public. These two entities, which are basically one and the same, conspired to withhold evidence from the medical community showing that COVID injections are dangerous and kill people. "They have to be held accountable," Dr. Makis says. "And let's not forget this nurse, among many, who was fired from her job for refusing the jab, pointing out jab related injuries, and the inability to code patient's [sic] charts as vaccinated so deaths were reported with a status of unvaxxed or unknown," tweeted the "Pikayla" (@TheRealPikayla) X / Twitter account, pointing to this article about nurse whistleblower Gail Macrae of California. "Now you understand why people were officially considered 'unvaccinated' until 14 days after the shot," tweeted another named "UnBaffle.me" (@unbaffle_me) about the screwy way the establishment tabulated data about "vaccinated" versus "unvaccinated" throughout the "pandemic." "Investigate and PROSECUTE Lancet personnel for WITHHOLDING important life-saving information!" added "Tim Kearney" (@Tinker2791). "Their cover-up resulted in thousands of additional deaths caused by the experimental [vaccines]! Prosecute!!!" The latest news about the dangers and ineffectiveness of COVID jabs can be found at BadMedicine.news. Sources for this article include: X.com NaturalNews.com SlayNews.com
Copy