
"I've decided to leave Scientific American after an exciting 4.5 years as editor-in-chief. I'm going to take some time to think about what comes next (and go birdwatching)," she said. Her rants during election night were massively lambasted by conservative voters online. Realizing the implications of her posts, Helmuth issued a public apology on the platform. "I made a series of offensive and inappropriate posts on my personal Bluesky account on election night, and I am sorry. I respect and value people across the political spectrum," she said, attributing her comments to "shock and confusion about the election results." (Related: Scientific American's Laura Helmuth continues campaign to embarrass and humiliate herself.) She said that she had deleted the posts and that they did not reflect the position of Scientific American or her colleagues. "I am committed to civil communication and editorial objectivity," she added. Despite removing her expletive-ridden posts and a public apology, Big Tech mogul Elon Musk, a vocal staunch supporter of Trump accused Helmuth of being a political activist who has taken over a scientific institution. Meanwhile, the magazine's president, Kimberly Lau, lauded the EIC's tenure as she issued a statement regarding Helmuth's resignation. "We thank Laura for her four years leading Scientific American during which time the magazine won major science communications awards and saw the establishment of a reimagined digital newsroom," Lau said. In 2020, under Helmuth's leadership in the publication, the magazine endorsed then-Democratic presidential bet Joe Biden. That was the first time in 175 years that Scientific American endorsed a presidential candidate. It also endorsed outgoing Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris this year. The editorial board claimed that Trump "endangers public health and safety and rejects evidence, preferring instead nonsensical conspiracy fantasies."?BREAKING! Disgraced @SciAm Editor in Chief @laurahelmuth Has Resigned! Among many pieces of disinformation Laura Helmuth falsely claimed the lab leak hypothesis is a conspiracy theory. And published a disinformation ridden pandemic origin article by Peter Jacobs & Stuart Neil. pic.twitter.com/cxDFYjxolE
— Florin (@Florin_Uncovers) November 14, 2024
Internal polling from Kamala Harris’ campaign never showed her beating Donald Trump
By Arsenio Toledo // Share
Ferrari’s commitment to ‘diversity and inclusivity’ called out for supreme hypocrisy
By News Editors // Share
Diesel Crack Spread Screams Economic Red Alert, and Inflation Will Soon Surge
By healthranger // Share
AI Isn't the Bubble, The Speculation Is... Here's Why You Can't Afford to Wait For It To Pop
By healthranger // Share
Fauci faces mounting legal pressure as Senate probes intensify
By willowt // Share
The Irrational Machine: A prophetic warning from the digital wilderness
By bellecarter // Share
Iran Stands Firm on Strait of Hormuz as Trump Warns Americans of Higher Gas Prices
By sterlingashworth // Share
Nvidia Scales Back $250 Billion Guarantee for OpenAI Data Center, Sources Say
By edisonreed // Share