NEVER FORGET: Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus called for aggressive crackdown on 'Anti-Vaxxers'
By ljdevon // 2025-03-04
Copy
 
As World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is cut off from U.S. funding and goes on to play the victim in world affairs, we should NEVER FORGET: not long ago, he called for a more aggressive stance against so-called "anti-vaxxers," labeling them a "serious challenge" to global vaccination efforts. Speaking at the 77th World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland, in June 2024, Ghebreyesus urged governments and health organizations to "push back" on vaccine skeptics, accusing them of creating "havoc" during the COVID-19 pandemic. This alarming rhetoric came as the WHO, heavily funded and influenced by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, continued to push a global vaccine agenda that prioritized control over genuine public health. Key Points:
  • Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus demanded a more aggressive approach to silencing vaccine skeptics, framing them as a threat to global health.
  • The WHO, with significant financial backing from the Gates Foundation, promoted a global vaccine agenda, including annual boosters, under the guise of public health.
  • The health freedom movement pushed back against WHO's blatant disregard for medical ethics, scientific integrity, and human rights.
  • WHO prioritized vaccine compliance over individual freedoms and pushed harmful interventions instead of establishing a true basis for healthy immune function.
The US broke from WHO in January of 2025, leaving the beleaguered multinational organization predominantly funded and controlled by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. This so-called philanthropic foundation was behind WHO’s push to put a needle in every man, woman, and child in 2021 and beyond. This global vaccine agenda, perpetuated through the WHO, would go on to include annual boosters for population control and reduction, as Bill Gates’ sordid depopulation agenda was put into motion in real time. This is why the Director General of the WHO, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, forfeited any shred of medical ethics or scientific integrity to maximize vaccine uptake, going as far as censoring public discourse online and challenging basic human rights in the process of coercing world populations to take depopulation jabs.

The WHO’s troubling ties to the Gates Foundation

The WHO’s funding structure revealed a concerning reliance on private interests, particularly the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Assessed contributions from member states accounted for less than 20% of the WHO’s budget, while voluntary contributions—primarily from NGOs and private entities—made up the remaining 80%. The Gates Foundation, as the second-largest voluntary funder, wielded significant influence over the WHO’s policies and initiatives. This financial dependency allowed the Gates Foundation to shape the WHO’s global health agenda, including its aggressive push for universal vaccination. During the COVID-19 scandal, the WHO championed vaccine mandates, annual boosters, and coercive measures to ensure compliance, often dismissing concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy. Health freedom advocates pushed back against this global agenda, which is aligned with Bill Gates’ controversial vision of population control, which he had previously linked to vaccines and healthcare.

The war on “Anti-Vaxxers”

During his speech at the 77th World Health Assembly, Ghebreyesus accused vaccine skeptics of exploiting the COVID-19 pandemic to spread "havoc." He stated, “I think it’s time to be more aggressive in pushing back on anti-vaxxers. I think they used COVID as an opportunity, and you know all the havoc they are creating.” This rhetoric was part of a broader campaign by the WHO to demonize and silence critics of its vaccine agenda. The organization had previously smeared vaccine skeptics as a "major killing force" and attempted to link them to far-right extremism. These tactics ignored growing evidence highlighting the dangers of COVID-19 vaccines, including millions of reported injuries and deaths. Ghebreyesus also praised the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), a Gates-funded organization, for its role in expanding vaccine access worldwide. He called for increased donations to GAVI’s "replenishment letter" program, further entrenching the financial ties between the WHO, GAVI, and the Gates Foundation.

A history of coercion and control

The WHO’s actions were not an isolated incident but the culmination of decades of influence by global elites. The Gates Foundation had long been a driving force behind the WHO’s vaccine initiatives, including the controversial COVAX program, which aimed to distribute COVID-19 vaccines to low-income countries. Critics argued that these programs prioritized profit and control over genuine public health, with little regard for individual safety or autonomy. The WHO’s push for universal vaccination also raised serious ethical concerns. By advocating for coercive measures, such as vaccine mandates and aggressive crackdowns on dissent, the organization undermined basic human rights and medical ethics. This approach reflected a broader trend of authoritarianism in global health governance, where individual freedoms were sacrificed in the name of collective security. The WHO’s call for a more aggressive stance against vaccine skeptics served as a stark reminder of the dangers of unchecked power in global health governance. Under the influence of the Gates Foundation, the WHO appeared to abandon its mandate to protect public health, instead prioritizing a coercive and authoritarian agenda. As the world grappled with the fallout from the biological warfare and propaganda of the COVID-19 scandal, it became more important than ever to question the motives and methods of those claiming to act in the name of public health. The WHO’s war on "anti-vaxxers" was not just an attack on dissent; it was an assault on the principles of freedom, autonomy, and scientific inquiry. If left unchecked, this dangerous path could lead to a future where individual rights are sacrificed on the altar of globalist control, and the needle becomes a tool of oppression rather than some savior it was advertised to be. Sources include: Expose-News.com Lifesitenews.com Youtube.com
Copy