Father speaks out: Challenging the mainstream narrative of his daughter's "unvaccinated measles death"
By ljdevon // 2025-04-14
Copy
 
  • Peter Hildebrand, father of Daisy, disputes the media's claim that his daughter died from measles.
  • Medical records and family testimony contradict the official narrative.
  • Hildebrand criticizes the hospital for not providing proper care, including budesonide treatment.
  • Alternative health advocates, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr., have supported the family's stance.
In a poignant and controversial interview, Peter Hildebrand, the father of eight-year-old Daisy, who was pronounced an "unvaccinated measles death" by the mainstream media, has come forward to challenge the official narrative. Hildebrand, along with his wife, firmly believes that Daisy did not die from measles, but rather from a lack of proper medical care. This case has reignited debates about the reliability of media reports and the treatment of patients in hospitals, especially those with alternative health beliefs. The interview, conducted by Polly Tommey of Children’s Health Defense, delves into the discrepancies between the media's portrayal and the family's account. Hildebrand's emotional testimony highlights the pain and anger he feels, not only over the loss of his daughter but also over the media's persistent misrepresentation of her death.

The family's story vs. the media's narrative

Peter Hildebrand is clear and resolute in his belief that Daisy did not die from measles. "No, absolutely not," he stated when asked if he and his wife believe Daisy's death was due to the disease. The family's stance is supported by medical records that contradict the media's claims. Hildebrand's frustration is palpable when he discusses the widespread reporting of Daisy's death as a measles case. "That hurts. It hurts very much. And that's exactly why I'm doing this interview. So hopefully people can understand that she did not die from measles," he said. Hildebrand's criticism extends to the hospital where Daisy was treated. He believes that the medical staff failed to provide the necessary care, particularly the budesonide breathing treatment that he and his family had requested. "They didn’t give her the budesonide breathing treatment that we’d been asking for. They were saying that the IV steroids they were giving her were better," Hildebrand explained. This omission, he argues, contributed to Daisy's deteriorating condition.

The role of alternative health advocates

The Hildebrand family sought advice from alternative health practitioners, including Dr. Ben Edwards and Dr. Richard Bartlett, who are known for their critical views on conventional medicine and the MMR vaccine. Hildebrand mentioned that Daisy was given vitamin A, which seemed to help initially. However, as her condition worsened, the family felt compelled to seek further medical assistance at a hospital. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a prominent critic of the pharmaceutical industry and advocate for vaccine safety, attended Daisy's funeral and a subsequent meeting with the family. Kennedy, who has praised Edwards and Bartlett as "extraordinary healers," has been a vocal supporter of the family's stance. His presence at the funeral and the meeting underscores the broader debate about the safety and efficacy of conventional medical treatments versus alternative approaches.

The broader implications

The case of Daisy Hildebrand raises important questions about the reliability of media reporting, the standard of care in hospitals, and the role of alternative health practices. Hospitals have standards of care for treating children who present with breathing difficulties. If the hospital in question did not follow best practices for treating Daisy, the records should be obtained and a medical malpractice suit should ensue. Hildebrand's call for accountability in the medical system is echoed by many who feel that the current healthcare model often fails to prioritize patient well-being over profit. Hildebrand's message to other parents is clear: "It [doesn't] matter whether the hospital takes your insurance or not, just make sure you go to a hospital that takes care of the people. Because when they don't take care of the people, they just end up dying, just like in Lubbock, Texas." This warning is a stark reminder of the importance of patient advocacy and the need for transparency in medical care. As the debate over Daisy Hildebrand's death continues, the broader implications of this case cannot be ignored. The conflict between mainstream medical practices and alternative health approaches, the role of the media in shaping public perception, and the need for accountability in healthcare are all critical issues that demand attention. In the words of Peter Hildebrand, "I’m willing to do any- and everything I can to make sure the hospitals start getting some ‘act right’ in them so nobody else has to go through this." The story of Daisy Hildebrand is a call to action, a plea for change, and a reminder that the truth often lies beyond the sensationalist - vaccine dogma headlines. Source include: X.com Yahoo.com Atlantic.com
Copy