Harvard fires star professor after investigation finds fabricated data in dishonesty studies
By isabelle // 2025-05-29
Copy
 
  • Harvard fired ethics professor Francesca Gino after a 1,300-page investigation found that she falsified data in multiple studies, marking its first tenure revocation since the 1940s.
  • Gino, who was once a million-dollar professor, was banned from campus, stripped of salary and benefits, and barred from publishing under Harvard’s name.
  • Critics highlight a double standard as former president Claudine Gay kept tenure and salary despite plagiarism allegations, while Gino faced swift punishment.
  • Gino sued Harvard and investigators for $25 million, but a federal judge dismissed her defamation claims, sealing her academic downfall.
  • The scandal exposes credibility cracks in Harvard and broader issues of accountability and misconduct in academia.
Harvard University, once considered the pinnacle of elite education, has fired Francesca Gino, a star behavioral scientist who studied dishonesty, after a 1,300-page investigation found she falsified data in multiple studies. The bombshell decision marks Harvard’s first tenure revocation since the 1940s, exposing deep cracks in the institution’s credibility while raising questions about accountability in academia. Gino, once a celebrated professor earning over $1 million annually, was placed on unpaid leave, banned from campus, and stripped of her salary and benefits after investigators concluded she manipulated data in four studies—including research ironically focused on honesty pledges. Meanwhile, Harvard’s former president Claudine Gay, who faced her own plagiarism allegations, retained tenure and a lavish salary, highlighting what critics call a double standard rooted in political ideology.

The rise and fall of a dishonesty researcher

Francesca Gino’s downfall began in 2021 when researchers from the blog Data Colada flagged suspicious data in her work. Their forensic analysis revealed that four of her co-authored studies published between 2012 and 2020 contained fabricated results. One retracted paper claimed that signing honesty pledges at the top of forms rather than the bottom reduced dishonest responses—a finding now deemed fraudulent. Harvard launched a preliminary probe, then a full investigation spanning 2022–2023. Faculty reviewed Gino’s emails, manuscripts, and raw data, while an outside forensics firm verified inconsistencies. The committee concluded she “engaged in multiple instances of research misconduct” across all four studies. Gino blamed “errors” by assistants or suggested “malicious” tampering, but investigators dismissed her claims. By March 2023, Harvard Business School Dean Srikant Datar moved to revoke her tenure. Gino, once the fifth-highest-paid Harvard employee, was suspended without pay, lost healthcare benefits, and barred from publishing under Harvard’s name.

Denials, lawsuits, and a judicial blow

Gino fought back fiercely. On her blog, she declared: “I did not commit academic fraud. I did not manipulate data to produce a particular result.” She sued Harvard, Dean Datar, and the Data Colada team for $25 million, alleging defamation and reputational harm. But in September 2024, a federal judge dismissed her defamation claims, ruling that as a public figure, she was subject to scrutiny under the First Amendment. The court’s decision cemented her academic exile—a rare fate for tenured faculty. The Gino scandal contrasts sharply with Harvard’s handling of former president Claudine Gay, who resigned amid plagiarism allegations but kept her tenure and million-dollar salary. Critics argue the disparity reveals a politicized double standard: while Gino faced swift expulsion, Gay—whose appointment aligned with Harvard’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) agenda—was shielded from similar consequences. Gino’s case underscores a growing crisis in academic research, where “publish or perish” pressures tempt scholars to cut corners. Her studies, once widely cited, now join a graveyard of retracted work. Meanwhile, Harvard’s reputation—already bruised by political controversies—faces further erosion. As Gino’s lawsuit limps forward, her legacy serves as a cautionary tale: even experts on dishonesty aren’t immune to its consequences. For Harvard, the reckoning is far from over. Sources for this article include: ZeroHedge.com NYPost.com DailyMail.co.uk
Copy