- Thomas Gale Moore's book, "Climate of Fear: Why We Shouldn't Worry about Global Warming," challenges the mainstream narrative on climate change, arguing that the fear surrounding it is exaggerated and politically motivated.
- Moore suggests that global warming has become a tool for fear-mongering, used by politicians, media and some scientists to advance their own agendas.
- The book delves into the potential negative economic consequences of aggressive climate policies, such as global recession, increased unemployment and heightened international tensions. Moore argues that drastic cuts in emissions could lead to a less safe and humane world.
- Moore posits that a warmer climate could bring benefits like longer growing seasons, healthier populations and reduced transportation costs. He draws on historical examples, such as the "Climatic Optimum" period, to support his argument that human progress has often coincided with warmer periods.
- In his conclusion, Moore advocates for a balanced and rational approach to climate policy, urging policymakers to consider the broader implications of their decisions and to avoid being swayed by fear and political expediency. He suggests that humanity can adapt and thrive in a warmer world.
Thomas Gale Moore's book, "
Climate of Fear: Why We Shouldn't Worry about Global Warming," dares to question the prevailing narrative on global warming.
Released at a time when climate change dominates headlines and international agendas, Moore's work offers a contrarian perspective that has sparked both debate and controversy. The book challenges readers to reconsider the urgency and potential consequences of global warming, arguing that the fear surrounding it may be overstated and politically motivated.
Moore begins his exploration with a provocative quote from H.L. Mencken: "The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed by menacing it with a series of hobgoblins."
This sets the tone for his central argument that
global warming has become a tool for fear-mongering, wielded by politicians, media outlets and even some scientists to advance their own agendas. He criticizes the apocalyptic scenarios often presented, such as those famously depicted by Al Gore, who once declared global warming "the most serious problem our civilization faces."
One of the book's most compelling sections delves into the history of climate predictions. Moore highlights the irony of how the 1970s were dominated by fears of global cooling, only for the narrative to shift dramatically to global warming in subsequent decades. He points out the inconsistencies and uncertainties within the scientific community, citing the revisions and disagreements among experts. For instance, he references climatologists like Richard Lindzen, S. Fred Singer and Patrick Michaels, who argue that the warming effects of greenhouse gases may be negligible or minimal.
Moore does not shy away from the economic implications of climate policies. He contends that
aggressive measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions could lead to a global recession, increased unemployment and heightened international tensions. He emphasizes the critical role of energy in modern life, suggesting that drastic cuts would result in a less safe, less humane and more difficult world. He criticizes the notion of "no-regrets" policies, such as energy conservation and fuel efficiency, arguing that they are not the "free lunch" they are often claimed to be.
The author also challenges the assumption that global warming would be entirely negative. He posits that a warmer climate could bring about benefits such as longer growing seasons, healthier populations and reduced transportation costs. Moore draws on historical examples, such as the "Climatic Optimum" period around 9,000 to 4,000 years ago, when temperatures were significantly warmer than today, yet civilizations thrived. He argues that human progress has often coincided with warmer periods, citing the Renaissance and the Little Climate Optimum of the High Middle Ages as evidence.
Furthermore, Moore critiques international efforts to combat global warming, such as the Kyoto Protocol. He argues that these agreements are flawed because they exempt major emitters like China and India, potentially harming the economies of developed nations while doing little to address the issue. He advocates for a cost-benefit analysis approach to climate policy, urging policymakers to weigh the costs of reducing emissions against the potential benefits.
Moore calls for a more rational and balanced approach to
the issue of global warming. He urges policymakers to consider the broader implications of their decisions and to avoid being swayed by fear and political expediency.
Learn more about
why we should not worry about global warming by watching the video below.
This video is from the
BrightLearn channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
Brighteon.ai
Brighteon.com
