Pet vaccinations
By newseditors // 2025-06-03
Copy
 
What follows hasn’t got anything to do with cars except in principle. That principle being the diminishing freedom we’re allowed to exercise when it comes to choosing what we consider to be right for us – as well as our pets. (Article by Eric republished from EricPetersAutos.com) It used to be the case that you just had them, if you wanted to. Now – in many areas – you are required to register them, just as you are required to do when you get a vehicle. Both require tags – issued by the government – denoting who is the real owner of them. Just the same as cows are “registered” by the ear tags they display. Naturally, the tags are not free – because neither are you. Or what really aren’t your pets, either. This brings up the matter of drug pushing. It is not called that, of course. It is only called that when the government wishes to derogate the non-coercive offering and purchasing of substances it has decreed to be illegal to offer and purchase non-coercively, most infamously marijuana. Though the government has lightened up a little with regard to that, it has done so only because it has recognized there’s more money to be made from taxing it than putting people in jail for non-coercively offering and purchasing it. Meanwhile, people who non-coercively offer other drugs not yet legalized are styled “pushers,” which is astoundingly effronterous given no one is pushed to buy these drugs. Veterinarians, on the other hand, do push drugs – just the same as human medicos have been doing. Both on account of the pushing of the government, which pushes the human and animal doctors to push them on their patients. Have you tried buying flea and tick repellent from a vet lately? The stuff that actually works being unavailable over-the-counter, very much of a piece with the cough syrup that works only being available if you beg the pharmacist to let you buy some and only after you have shown ID and been duly catalogued into the system. In our area – and perhaps yours as well – the vet will not sell you the flea and tick repellent unless you first bring your cat or dog in for a “wellness exam,” which of course isn’t free, either. This exam is similar to the state “safety” inspection grift. There is nothing wrong with your vehicle – or animal – but the state (and) vet require the “inspection,” for the same reason you are told you “owe” what are styled “your” taxes. Because there’s money – and control – in it. It does not end there. The next thing, when you bring the cat or dog in for inspection, is a question: Has your pet been vaccinated? If not, the vet will demand that you agree to having your cat or dog vaccinated – because the government requires it. If you do not agree, then the vet will refuse to treat your pet. See how that works? The vet may not like this business but is made to be the accomplice/enforcer of the government. Just as teenage kids were used to enforce “mask” requirements at the doors of stores. Here’s your “mask,” they said. It does not matter whether your pet needs to be vaccinated anymore than it mattered that a person who wasn’t sick didn’t need to wear a “mask.” I tried to make this argument. Unsuccessfully. The vet refused to issue flea/tick repellent unless we brought the cat in for an “wellness exam.” Our year-old cat that is quite well, just as my truck’s brakes are in good working order and its tires aren’t bald. I do not require an inspection to tell me they are – in either case. But it’s worse in this case, because while it is important that a vehicle’s brakes be in good working order and its tires not bald, a rabies vaccination is worse than unimportant for an animal that stands essentially no chance of catching this sickness because it never goes outdoors. But how about the chance of catching cancer from the drugs being pushed? An indoor cat might, it is true, get out. And a rabid bat or mouse might get in. But this is a risk on par with that of a healthy person dying from the cold marketed as “COVID.” One so low, in other words, that it is not worth the risk of the vaccination. This being even greater, probably, than the now-known risks of being injected with the “COVID” vaccines because there are even fewer safeguards in place – and no liability whatsoever – when it comes to the drugs that are pushed on animals. That’s why we said no to the pusher, who is incidentally a vet. Just as human doctors have become pushers of drugs, too. It is an ugly thing but a no less true thing for being so. It says something ugly about what’s become of this country. Read more at: EricPetersAutos.com
Copy