The CLIMATE is about as “human-induced” as the stars of the Milky Way, but CNN and the Climate Cult would have us all believe otherwise
By sdwells // 2025-07-01
Copy
 
Oh that pesky Climate Cult. They never seem to have enough money in their pockets, even though they own private islands, jets, yachts, and multiple mansions. They use fabricated and altered charts and statistics to brainwash all the peons that are drunk on fluoridated water and junk science food stuff into donating all their energy, thought and quadruple-taxed dollars for a fake science “theory” that’s disproven by all the real data dating back tens, hundreds and thousands of years. Take a look:
  1. Heatwaves Were Worse in the Past – Historical NOAA data show that U.S. heatwaves were far more frequent and severe in the 1930s and 1950s than today, contradicting claims that modern heat events are unprecedented. CNN ignores this context while cherry-picking short-term spikes.
  2. Urban Heat Island Effect Explains Rising Nighttime Temperatures – CNN acknowledges warmer nights in cities but fails to clarify that this is driven by urbanization (asphalt, buildings, waste heat), not global warming. Rural stations show slower warming; undermining alarmist claims about climate-linked heatwave trends.
  3. Attribution Studies Are Flawed and Politicized – CNN relies on rapid "attribution" models from groups like WWA, which assume climate change drives extreme weather before analyzing data. These models overpredict warming, lack empirical validation, and are rushed out post-event to fit a narrative—not rigorous science.
  4. Heat-Related Deaths Are Declining Globally – Despite claims that heatwaves are "more deadly," data show a 95%+ drop in weather-related fatalities (including heat) over the past century due to adaptation and technology. CNN overlooks this while sensationalizing unsubstantiated risks.

Heat Waves and Climate Narratives: Unpacking Claims vs. Historical Data"

Amid growing concerns about climate change fueling more extreme weather, CNN recently asserted that heat waves are becoming “more common, intense, and longer-lasting” due to human activity. However, long-term temperature records tell a different story—one that challenges mainstream climate narratives. Data from NOAA and independent analysts reveal that U.S. heat waves were far worse in the 1930s and 1950s than today, raising questions about media accuracy and the politicization of climate science. According to NOAA records spanning 1895–2023, the 1930s witnessed significantly more frequent and severe heat waves than recent decades. Figure 1, compiled from 828 U.S. temperature stations, shows days exceeding 95°F, 100°F, and 105°F peaked in the Dust Bowl era and declined afterward. Despite this evidence, CNN’s reporting omits historical context, focusing instead on climate models that assume human-caused warming dominates modern trends. Critics argue such omissions distort public understanding. "Attribution studies rely on models predisposed to confirming human influence," said one climate analyst. "They’re not observational science—they’re simulations with built-in assumptions." CNN acknowledges rising nighttime temperatures in cities—an effect well-documented as the Urban Heat Island (UHI) phenomenon, driven by asphalt, concrete, and waste heat. Yet rural stations show minimal warming compared to urban centers, undercutting claims of a global crisis. "This selective reporting ignores natural variability," noted a Climate Realism researcher. "The media highlights short-term spikes while downplaying past extremes." For example, Europe’s recent heat waves were less severe than those in the early 20th century, before significant CO2 emissions. Meanwhile, climate-related deaths have plummeted globally since the 1920s, thanks to better infrastructure and forecasting (Figure 2). Bjorn Lomborg’s analysis of disaster data shows a 95% decline in weather-related fatalities, contradicting CNN’s "deadlier heat" narrative. CNN’s reliance on rapid, non-peer-reviewed attribution studies—often published within days of an event—has drawn criticism for prioritizing alarmism over accuracy. Historical records suggest today’s heat extremes are neither unprecedented nor steadily worsening. The disconnect between data and headlines underscores a broader debate: Is climate reporting driven by science, or by sensationalism? Until media reconcile long-term evidence with their narratives, public trust in climate discourse may continue to erode. Check out ClimateAlarmism.news for updates on the Climate Cult and Fake News lying through their teeth about heat waves and weather-weapon initiated arson in Los Angeles, Hawaii, and wherever else they want to take over some land. Sources for this article include: NaturalNews.com BezoEarthFund.org ClimateDepot.com        
Copy