INSIDIOUS NIH just funded and barcoded TWO HUNDRED brand new gain-of-function COVID viruses they can release soon for the next MASSIVE PLANDEMIC
By sdwells // 2025-07-02
Copy
 
Trump needs to put a halt to all this biological warfare “research” that will only wind up infecting billions of innocent civilians. NIH should be SHUT DOWN for fraud, waste and corruption until ethical scientists can be vetted and put in place for actual helpful research. Here’s what’s going on right now and being funded at NIH:
  1. NIH-Funded Creation of Synthetic Viruses
    • Researchers created 200+ novel "barcoded" SARS-CoV-2 viruses in the lab using reverse genetics, funded by NIH grants (R01AI169022, U01AI151810). These constructs do not exist in nature and were engineered for tracking in transmission studies.
  2. Gain-of-Function Concerns
    • All constructs were modified with the D614G spike mutation, known to enhance transmissibility and viral replication — a hallmark of gain-of-function research. This raises alarms given the lab-leak theory surrounding COVID-19’s origins.
  3. Contradictions in Oversight
    • The work was conducted in BSL-3 labs under NIH protocols, yet parallels risky pre-pandemic research (e.g., WIV1 chimeras) that bypassed P3CO review. Dr. Fauci’s prior denial of funding gain-of-function is contradicted by such projects.
  4. Pandemic Risk Amid Accountability Failures
    • Despite global scrutiny of lab-engineered pathogens post-COVID, taxpayer dollars continue funding synthetic virus batches — now with trackable barcodes. Critics argue this prioritizes academic curiosity over biosafety and pandemic prevention.

NIH-funded scientists create over 200 lab-made, "barcoded" COVID viruses with enhanced transmissibility

In a controversial move, U.S. government-funded researchers have engineered more than 200 synthetic, lab-made versions of SARS-CoV-2 — each modified for heightened transmissibility — using advanced genetic techniques. The work, detailed in a peer-reviewed Science Advances study published January 15, 2025, was conducted at Washington University School of Medicine under multiple National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants. The revelation comes as U.S. intelligence agencies and lawmakers increasingly acknowledge that COVID-19 likely originated from a lab-related incident involving high-risk pathogen research. Critics warn such experiments could inadvertently trigger another pandemic. The study confirms researchers used a reverse genetics system to construct the viruses, assembling genetic material not found in nature. Each pathogen was tagged with a unique six-nucleotide "barcode," allowing scientists to track individual strains during animal experiments. According to the paper, the team pooled “>200 barcoded SARS-CoV-2 viruses” based on equal infectious viral titers. Notably, these synthetic constructs were created under NIH-funded biosafety level-3 (BSL-3) containment protocols — a mid-tier safeguard for dangerous pathogens. The authors emphasized that none of the lab-made viruses mirror circulating SARS-CoV-2 lineages, raising ethical concerns about the justification for their creation. All 200+ lab-made viruses were deliberately modified to include the D614G spike mutation — a change linked to increased viral transmissibility in humans. The study notes: “We also introduced a D614G mutation in the Spike gene of SARS-CoV-2.” Virological research has long classified D614G as a gain-of-function trait, meaning it enhances viral replication and infectivity. Prior studies found this mutation boosts replication in human lung cells and airway tissues, making viruses more efficient at infecting hosts. Critics argue that engineering pathogens with such traits — especially after the pandemic — risks repeating past mistakes. The NIH’s continued funding of synthetic virus research puts the agency at odds with growing scrutiny over gain-of-function studies. The White House, Congress, and intelligence agencies now concede COVID-19 likely stemmed from a lab incident involving similar work — yet taxpayer dollars still flow into projects creating novel pathogens. Proponents argue these experiments help understand transmission, but skeptics question the necessity. “We’re building from scratch what nature didn’t, then hoping containment holds,” said one virologist familiar with the study, who requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the topic. As the world recovers from COVID-19’s devastation, the NIH’s latest project underscores a recurring dilemma: balancing scientific curiosity against existential risks. With over 200 enhanced viruses now confined to a lab — but backed by federal funds — the line between preparedness and peril remains dangerously thin. Whether such research advances public health or invites catastrophe may only be clear in hindsight. Bookmark plague.info to your favorite independent websites for updates on TWO HUNDRED new gain-of-function viruses NIH, CDC and WHO plan to release into the “wild” while blaming infected bat soup eaters at the Wuhan wet market. Sources for this article include: Pandemic.news GatewayPundit.com NaturalNews.com Modernity.news
Copy