FAKE SCIENCE and FAKE VACCINE RESEARCH published in medical journals will REMAIN with no retractions, despite RFK Jr. calling BS on it all
By sdwells // 2025-08-13
Copy
 
The Vaccine Industrial Complex is dug in deep and will be for some time to come. They won’t relinquish control so easily, and they’re clinging to their fake science like there’s no tomorrow. Case in point. The Annals of Internal Medicine has declined to retract a controversial Danish study examining aluminum in vaccines and autism risk, despite demands from U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and other critics. Editor-in-chief Dr. Christine Laine stated that, per the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors’ guidelines, retraction is warranted only for serious errors invalidating findings or for documented misconduct—neither of which were found.
  • The Annals of Internal Medicine rejected calls to retract a Danish study that found no link between aluminum in vaccines and autism, stating retraction is warranted only for major errors or misconduct, neither of which occurred.
  • The study analyzed records of 1.2 million Danish children (1997–2018) and found no increased risk of autism or other chronic conditions from higher aluminum content, though critics argue corrected supplemental data suggest a significant autism risk in higher-dose groups.
  • Children’s Health Defense scientists claim the authors’ reanalysis excluded nearly 40% of the moderate-dose cohort, removing statistical significance; the authors maintain their primary analysis is most reliable and that supplemental results are less stable.
  • Critics also fault the study for lacking a control group of unvaccinated children, while the authors argue such a group would differ too much in healthcare use to yield unbiased results.

Journal Rejects Calls to Retract Danish Study Claiming No Link Between Aluminum in Vaccines and Autism

The study analyzed national vaccination records of approximately 1.2 million Danish children born between 1997 and 2018, tracking rates of 50 chronic health conditions. Researchers concluded there was no link between aluminum content in vaccines and increased risk for autism, autoimmune diseases, asthma, or allergies. Controversy escalated after the journal published corrected supplementary materials on July 17, replacing an incorrect version uploaded at initial publication on July 15. Children’s Health Defense (CHD) scientists, including Dr. Karl Jablonowski, claimed the corrected data showed a statistically significant association between higher aluminum doses and autism—reporting that 9.7 per 10,000 children receiving higher doses developed neurodevelopmental disorders between ages two and five. Jablonowski asserted that the corrected Figure 11 contradicted the study’s conclusions. The authors responded by cautioning that supplemental analyses should be interpreted carefully, as they could be unstable or biased. They reanalyzed the Figure 11 data, excluding children born before 2002, which removed the statistical significance observed by CHD. Critics, including CHD’s chief scientific officer Dr. Brian Hooker, accused the authors of arbitrarily removing 38.3% of the moderate-dose cohort—over 268,000 children—thus reducing statistical power to detect an effect. Jablonowski argued the reanalysis was unjustified, noting no difference in adjusted hazard ratios between earlier and later birth cohorts that would explain the removal’s impact. Other experts, such as Dr. Steven Black and Dr. Daniel Salmon, acknowledged limitations in both the Danish study and a similar 2023 study it was modeled after, suggesting the aluminum–autism question remains open and carries public health significance. The authors clarified their research examined only whether amount of aluminum affected chronic disease risk—not whether any aluminum exposure increased risk. They excluded 15,237 children who received no aluminum-containing vaccines, citing concerns these children differed substantially in healthcare interactions, which could bias results. Critics argued this decision prevented a meaningful unexposed control comparison. Additional criticisms came from scientists including Christopher Exley, Paul Koshy, and Yaakov Ophir, who challenged the study’s scope and methodology. The authors maintained their conclusions apply only within the Danish vaccination schedule during the study period. The journal also explained the July 17 correction, attributing the initial supplemental upload error to an administrative oversight. According to Laine, during peer review the authors updated analyses to include missing psychiatric hospital contact data, but the initial supplement was mistakenly posted at publication. The corrected version replaced it immediately upon discovery, with no misconduct involved. In sum, the journal stands by the study’s integrity, while critics argue that data handling decisions and methodological limitations leave the aluminum–autism debate unresolved. Bookmark Vaccines.news to your favorite independent websites for updates on experimental gene therapy injections that lead to autism, early death, infertility, turbo cancer and Long-Vax-Syndrome. Sources for this article include: Pandemic.news NaturalNews.com ChildrensHealthDefense.org      
Copy