Trump admin explores 10% equity stake in Intel, sparks debate over government overreach in critical tech sector
By willowt // 2025-08-21
Copy
 
  • The Trump administration is in discussions to convert Intel's CHIPS Act grants into a 10% equity stake, potentially making the U.S. government the company's largest shareholder.
  • This move mirrors a recent Pentagon investment in a rare earths company and signals a new, interventionist approach to industrial policy.
  • Administration officials cite national security concerns over reliance on Taiwanese chip manufacturing as a primary motivation.
  • The potential deal highlights Intel's struggles to compete globally and its critical role in U.S. semiconductor ambitions.
  • The proposal raises significant questions about the government's role in private industry and the future of the CHIPS Act under President Trump.
In a move that signals a profound shift in U.S. industrial policy, the Trump administration is actively discussing a plan to take a direct financial stake in Intel Corporation, the beleaguered American semiconductor pioneer. According to multiple reports from Bloomberg and confirmations from senior officials, the government is considering converting approximately $10.4 billion in CHIPS and Science Act grants into equity, closely aligning with the total grant money the company was slated to receive. The exact structure remains fluid, including whether the White House will choose to go ahead with the deal. Last month, the Defense Deparment said it would take a $400 million equity stake in rare-earth producer MP Materials Corp., making the Pentagon its largest shareholder. Supporters point out that these industries are vital to technology development and our ability to compete globally.

National security vs. return on investment

The administration’s top officials have presented a nuanced, if not entirely aligned, rationale for the potential investment. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent emphasized pure national security concerns, stating the goal is to “help stabilize the company for chip production here in the U.S.” and eliminate a “single point of failure” posed by reliance on Taiwan for advanced chips. He explicitly denied any intention to “put pressure... to drum up business” for Intel. Conversely, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick framed the equity model as a matter of fiscal prudence, contrasting it with the Biden administration’s approach of “literally giving Intel [money] – for free.” He stated, “Donald Trump turns that into saying, ‘Hey, we want equity for the money.’ America should get the benefit of the bargain.”

Intel’s precarious position and global context

This government lifeline is being extended to a company at a critical juncture. Intel, once the undisputed leader of the global chip industry, has fallen behind competitors like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) and South Korea’s Samsung in manufacturing technology and has largely missed the lucrative boom in artificial intelligence processors dominated by Nvidia and AMD. Despite plans for a massive $20 billion expansion of its U.S. manufacturing capacity, the company has struggled to attract major external customers to its foundry business. The CHIPS Act, passed with bipartisan support in 2022, was designed precisely to prevent such a decline and revitalize the U.S. semiconductor sector, which is seen as essential for both economic competitiveness and military superiority. President Trump, while supportive of onshoring chip production, has been a vocal critic of the grant-based structure of the CHIPS Act itself.

Implications for industry and statecraft

The contemplation of a direct stake raises profound questions about the future of American capitalism and industrial strategy.
  • Would a government seat on Intel’s board influence corporate strategy, customer relationships or technology development in the name of national interest?
  • Could this model be applied to other companies receiving federal subsidies, effectively creating a new class of state-influenced “national champions”?
  • How does this align with traditional conservative principles of limited government and free-market competition?
White House spokesman Kush Desai declined to comment on specifics, noting that “no deal is official until it’s announced by the administration.” Intel has stated it is “deeply committed to supporting President Trump’s efforts to strengthen U.S. technology and manufacturing leadership” but would not comment on rumors.

A new chapter in economic statecraft

The discussion of a federal equity stake in Intel is more than a financial transaction; it is a bold experiment in economic statecraft. It acknowledges that the sheer scale of investment required to compete in foundational technologies like semiconductors may necessitate unprecedented public-private collaboration, blurring long-standing lines between government and industry. Whether this approach will successfully restore U.S. semiconductor primacy, protect national security and deliver a return for taxpayers, or whether it will lead to market distortion and government overreach, remains to be seen. The outcome will not only determine the fate of an American icon but could also redefine the government’s role in shaping the nation’s technological future for decades to come. Sources for this article include: ZeroHedge.com CNBC.com CNN.com
Copy