NATURAL NEWS

Trump administration targets radical leftist NGOs: Calls for RICO investigation intensify

By kevinhughes // 2025-09-13

In the wake of escalating political tensions and the assassination of conservative figure Charlie Kirk, President Donald Trump and a growing number of Republican lawmakers are intensifying their calls for a comprehensive investigation into the funding and influence of radical leftist non-governmental organizations (NGOs). The push for a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act investigation has sparked a fierce debate, with proponents arguing it is necessary to combat "civil terrorism" and critics warning it could stifle free speech. Trump has publicly expressed his intent to scrutinize the activities of billionaire George Soros and his affiliated organizations, suggesting that their support for violent protests could constitute a RICO violation. This move comes as part of a broader effort to address the influence of what Trump describes as a "dark money" network of leftist NGOs, which he accuses of orchestrating chaos and division across the country. (Related: Soros-funded chaos: How liberal activism fuels domestic terrorism against Tesla.) Civil terrorism expert Jason Curtis Anderson of One City Rising emphasizes the complexity of the issue, stating, "What will likely be revealed is a complex web of dark money that observers have warned about for 20 years but never acted on." This network includes entities like the George Soros Open Society Foundation, the Tides Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation, among others, which collectively form a significant portion of America's dark-money ecosystem. These organizations are accused of funding protests, bailing out demonstrators, financing legal challenges against local governments and influencing policy decisions, including immigration and criminal justice reforms. The opaque nature of their financial transactions, often facilitated by fiscal sponsorship loopholes, has made it difficult to trace the flow of funds and assess their true impact.

The RICO debate: Political posturing or legal necessity?

The invocation of RICO in this context has added a legal dimension to the debate. Originally designed to combat organized crime, RICO allows for the prosecution of groups engaged in a pattern of illegal activity. Applying it to NGOs is a bold move, suggesting that their actions may extend beyond free speech and into the realm of coordinated, harmful behavior. Critics argue that using RICO in this manner could set a dangerous precedent, potentially chilling legitimate activism and free expression. They caution against conflating genuine protest movements with orchestrated efforts to destabilize society. However, proponents of the investigation argue that the severity of the allegations warrants a thorough examination. "The RICO Act is a federal law designed to dismantle organized crime by targeting criminal enterprises — such as mafias, cartels or corrupt corporate networks — that engage in ongoing illegal activity (e.g., fraud, bribery, extortion or drug trafficking)," Brighteon.AI's Enoch explained. "It allows prosecutors to charge individuals not just for isolated crimes but for participating in a pattern of racketeering—meaning they conspired to infiltrate, control or profit from legitimate businesses (like pharmaceutical companies, banks or government agencies) while systematically breaking the law, often across state lines." RICO carries severe penalties, including forfeiture of assets, fines and lengthy prison sentences, making it a powerful tool against deep-seated corruption — whether in the underworld or the corporate and political elite.

Calls for transparency and accountability

Republican lawmakers, led by Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), have called for the establishment of a select committee with subpoena powers to investigate the "money, influence and power behind the radical left's assault on America and the rule of law." In a letter to House leadership, the lawmakers emphasized the need to "follow the money" and uncover the forces driving these coordinated attacks. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which has been criticized by some for its role in monitoring extremist groups, defended its work, stating, "We must have a meaningful national conversation about violence and polarization in America." The SPLC's statement highlights the broader context of the debate, emphasizing the importance of addressing the underlying conditions that contribute to hate and violence. The push for investigations into radical leftist NGOs is part of a larger narrative surrounding the influence of money in politics and the potential for foreign interference in domestic affairs. The Trump administration's focus on this issue reflects a growing concern among conservatives about the impact of well-funded advocacy groups on public policy and public perception. As the debate unfolds, it raises critical questions about the balance between protecting free speech and ensuring accountability for those who may be exploiting it for nefarious purposes. The outcome of these investigations could have far-reaching implications for the future of activism, philanthropy and political discourse in the United States. In conclusion, the call for a RICO investigation into radical leftist NGOs is a contentious issue that underscores the deep divisions within American politics. While the intention to combat "civil terrorism" and hold powerful actors accountable is clear, the path forward must be navigated with caution to avoid unintended consequences for civil liberties and democratic processes. Watch the video below about President Donald Trump being praised for freezing funding to NGOs. This video is from the NewsClips channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

Elon Musk slams Left as "party of murder" following Charlie Kirk assassination. GREAT REPLACEMENT plan via ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION proven NOT to be conspiracy theory as the Empire of George Soros dictates in Project Syndicate. Charlie Kirk assassination sparks fears of civil war as conservatives blame deep state, Mossad. Sources include: ZeroHedge.com Capwolf.com Brighteon.ai TheHill.com

Donald Trump America conspiracy SPLC big government deep state Rockefeller Foundation domestic terrorism George Soros rico libtards open society foundation Tides Foundation Liberal Mob progress NGOs Republican lawmakers left cult real investigations civil terrorism dark money Chip Roy Charlie Kirk