Florida launches probe into teachers over social media posts celebrating Charlie Kirk's assassination

By avagrace // 2025-09-16

Copy

The Florida Department of Education has launched a statewide investigation into public school teachers who allegedly used social media to celebrate or justify the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
The investigation is based on the state's "Principles of Professional Conduct," which hold educators to a higher standard, arguing that even personal online speech can undermine trust and reduce their effectiveness if it makes students or families feel unwelcome.
The state acknowledges educators' First Amendment rights but contends these rights are limited by their professional duties, creating a complex legal balancing act between free speech and a public employee's conduct.
Free speech organizations like FIRE warn that while discipline may be justified if speech disrupts workplace duties, punishing employees solely for their repugnant private views is generally unconstitutional.
This situation is a microcosm of a national debate, testing the nation's commitment to its foundational values and potentially setting a precedent for how states handle teachers' speech in the digital age.

Florida's Department of Education has initiated a statewide investigation into public school teachers who allegedly used social media to celebrate or justify the recent assassination of prominent conservative activist Charlie Kirk. The action, announced by Education Commissioner Anastasios Kamoutsas on Sept. 11, underscores the state's commitment to holding educators to a higher standard of conduct, even in their personal online lives, following a shocking act of political violence that has polarized the nation. The investigation was triggered after state officials became aware of what Kamoutsas described as despicable comments made by a small number of Florida educators. In a formal memo dispatched to every school district superintendent in the state, Kamoutsas declared that he would personally oversee an inquiry into every educator found engaging in what he labeled as vile and sanctionable behavior. He was careful to note that these individuals are not representative of the vast majority of Florida's high-quality teachers but insisted that their actions demand accountability. (Related: The assassination of Charlie Kirk: A grave blow to free speech in America.) The commissioner's authority to investigate and potentially revoke state teaching certifications is rooted in Florida's administrative code and state statutes. Kamoutsas specifically cited Rule 6A-10.081, known as the Principles of Professional Conduct for the Education Profession in Florida. This set of ethical guidelines requires certified educators to maintain a standard of behavior that does not undermine the trust of students and their families. Acknowledging the constitutional protections afforded to all citizens, Kamoutsas stated that while educators do possess First Amendment rights, these rights are not without limits when applied to their professional duties. The core of the state's position is that a public school teacher's role as a trusted community figure carries inherent responsibilities that can curtail absolute free speech, especially when that speech could poison the educational atmosphere for students and parents. According to Brighteon.AI's Enoch, the Principles of Professional Conduct for the Education Profession in Florida are designed to ensure that educators maintain high ethical standards and uphold the trust placed in them by the community.

A national conversation on speech and safety

Kirk's assassination as he engaged with students on a college campus represents a profound attack on the very principle of open discourse. In its aftermath, a critical national conversation has emerged, grappling with the coarsening of political dialogue and the frightening escalation from heated rhetoric to actual violence. The situation in Florida is a microcosm of this larger struggle, testing the nation's commitment to its foundational values during a period of intense grief and anger. Organizations dedicated to free speech have watched Florida's response with concern. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), a non-partisan group known for defending First Amendment rights on campuses, offered a nuanced view. Senior Program Counsel Stephanie Jablonsky acknowledged that public school teachers do not have unlimited free speech protection and that discipline might be justified if their off-duty speech genuinely undermines their ability to perform their duties or causes serious workplace disruption. However, Jablonsky issued a critical warning, stating that punishment based solely on official disapproval of an employee's private views is generally unconstitutional. She argued that in the wake of a tragic murder that was itself a betrayal of free speech, the response should be to redouble commitment to open debate, not to erode it by punishing repugnant viewpoints. The principle, she emphasized, is that free speech must protect even the speech one finds most odious. The investigation into Florida's teachers is a significant moment that probes the delicate intersection of free speech, professional ethics and political tribalism. It forces an examination of what society expects from its educators and how a nation heals and maintains its principles after an act of horrific violence. The outcome will likely resonate far beyond Florida's borders, setting a potential precedent for how other states navigate the complex and often incendiary world of teachers' speech in the digital age. Watch as President Donald Trump announces to honor Charlie Kirk with the highest award. This video is from the NewsClips channel on Brighteon.com.

NATURAL NEWS

A national conversation on speech and safety

More related stories: