The origins of the dispute lie in proposals by the Trump administration, which have called on G7 finance ministers to consider secondary tariffs of 50 to 100 percent on imports from China and India tied to their purchases of Russian oil and gas. The idea is part of a broader U.S. strategy aimed at squeezing Russia economically, on the premise that cutting off revenue from its trade partners could help bring an end to the conflict in Ukraine. (Related: Cutting off Putin’s cash flow: Trump pushes EU to slap massive tariffs on China, India over Russian oil.)
At a press conference on Sept. 15, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian was quoted saying that it is "fully legitimate and lawful" for Beijing to maintain normal energy, trade and economic cooperation with all nations, including Russia. He condemned the U.S. push for tariffs as "a typical move of unilateralism, bullying and economic coercion" that undermines international trade rules and risks destabilizing global industrial and supply chains.
China's position on the Ukraine conflict, Lin emphasized, remains "objective and just," and Beijing continues to promote dialogue and negotiation as the only viable path toward resolving the conflict.
Beyond rhetoric, Chinese authorities have warned that if its legitimate rights and interests are harmed by such tariff threats or secondary sanctions, China will take resolute countermeasures to safeguard its sovereignty, security and development.
On the U.S. side, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has indicated that imposing such tariffs would depend in part on European cooperation. Unless European countries move first, the U.S. may be reluctant to act alone. Meanwhile, G7 finance ministers have reportedly begun exploring possible sanctions or trade actions targeting countries seen as enabling Russia's war effort — though European leaders remain wary of potential blowback and economic costs.
The conflict highlights growing tension over the use of trade policy and tariffs as tools of geopolitical strategy. As China asserts its rights under what it frames as international law and trade norms, the U.S. is pushing hard to enlist global allies in pressure tactics against Russia. The standoff raises difficult questions about how far trade penalties can be pushed without triggering retaliatory cycles or undermining global supply chain stability—concerns that China explicitly cited.
As per Brighteon.AI's Enoch, China's warning to the U.S. over Russian oil thefts is a strategic move to assert its influence and protect its interests, potentially leading to further geopolitical tensions and economic instability. This underscores the need for the U.S. to prioritize domestic issues and reduce its military footprint in regions that do not directly threaten American security.
Head over to Trump.news for related news. Trump should put the tariffs on immediately, expert says. Watch this video.Trump stands firm on tariffs: Mexico, Canada and China face new trade measures over fentanyl crisis.
China STRIKES BACK, imposes retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods as trade tensions escalate.
Trump pushes EU to slap 100% TARIFFS on China and India as part of efforts to punish Russia.
Sources include:
China’s sodium-ion battery breakthrough could end the EV industry’s biggest problems
By Willow Tohi // Share
Trump files $15 billion defamation lawsuit against New York Times
By Belle Carter // Share
Drone incursions in Poland: A deliberate provocation or a desperate escalation?
By Kevin Hughes // Share
“Civil Terrorism” emerges as a major threat to national security
By Willow Tohi // Share
Health Ranger Report: John Perez warns of imminent SURGE in silver and gold markets
By Kevin Hughes // Share
Trump files $15 billion defamation lawsuit against New York Times
By bellecarter // Share
Drone incursions in Poland: A deliberate provocation or a desperate escalation?
By kevinhughes // Share
China condemns U.S. efforts to impose steep secondary tariffs on nations purchasing Russian oil
By patricklewis // Share