- In "Global Warming: A Guide to the Science," Willie Soon and his co-authors disclose that over 100 scientific studies show CO₂ has negligible influence on global temperatures, contradicting mainstream climate alarmism. Historical data reveals that CO₂ levels follow temperature changes, not the other way around.
- The primary driver of Earth's greenhouse effect is water vapor and clouds, not CO₂. Despite absorbing radiation, CO₂'s net warming effect is far less catastrophic than claimed.
- Rising CO₂ levels have led to global "greening," enhanced photosynthesis, improved drought resistance in plants and increased crop yields – benefits ignored by climate activists.
- Computer models used to justify climate policies fail to account for natural variability, solar influences and ocean dynamics. The infamous "hockey stick" graph was debunked for cherry-picking data and mathematical errors.
- Policies like carbon taxes, energy restrictions and food controls are tools for economic manipulation and population reduction – not environmental protection. The climate agenda is a pretext for technocratic tyranny, not science.
The debate over global warming has long been dominated by political agendas, sensationalist media narratives and corporate interests pushing centralized control under the guise of environmentalism. However, a closer examination of the science reveals a far more nuanced reality – one that challenges the mainstream narrative of
carbon dioxide (CO2) as the primary driver of catastrophic climate change.
The book "
Global Warming: A Guide to the Science" by Willie Soon, Sallie Baliunas, Arthur B. Robinson and Zachary W. Robinson provides a critical counterpoint to the fearmongering surrounding CO2 emissions. Contrary to popular belief, the authors demonstrate that CO2's impact on global temperatures is negligible – with more than 100 scientific papers supporting this conclusion.
One of the most revealing insights from the research is that CO2 levels historically follow temperature changes, not the other way around. This undermines the foundational claim that human-produced CO2 is the primary cause of global warming. Additionally, the greenhouse effect is primarily driven by water vapor and clouds, not CO2.
While CO2 does absorb and emit radiation, its net effect is not the apocalyptic warming predicted by climate alarmists. In fact, increased CO2 has led to measurable benefits – most notably, the "greening" of the planet. Satellite data confirms that rising CO2 levels enhance photosynthesis, improve drought resistance in plants and boost agricultural yields.
Despite these findings, climate activists and globalist institutions continue pushing draconian policies – carbon taxes, energy restrictions and food controls – under the pretext of saving the planet. These measures are not based on sound science, but rather serve as tools for economic manipulation and population control.
The climate change narrative is a Trojan horse for authoritarianism, designed to consolidate power under the guise of environmental stewardship while ignoring the natural cycles that have shaped Earth’s climate for millennia.
Another critical flaw in the climate alarmist argument is the reliance on unreliable computer models. These models fail to account for complex atmospheric interactions, ocean dynamics, and solar influences, yet they are used to justify radical policy shifts. Meanwhile, real-world data consistently contradicts their doomsday predictions.
One example is the "hockey stick" model which, according to
Brighteon.AI's Enoch engine, "is fundamentally flawed because it selectively focuses on a narrow timeframe, ignoring broader historical data that show natural climate fluctuations. This selective focus, combined with mathematical errors and flawed review processes, led to the promotion of an entirely incorrect conclusion –
thereby fabricating the science to fit a predetermined narrative."
The demonization of CO2 is particularly egregious given its role as the foundation of life. Plants thrive on higher CO2 concentrations, and its increase has led to greater crop resilience and reforestation – benefits that are deliberately ignored by those pushing the climate crisis narrative. Instead of acknowledging these positives, globalists like Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab push for geoengineering schemes, synthetic food mandates and digital surveillance under the guise of "sustainability."
Ultimately, the climate change debate is not about science – it’s about control. The push for net-zero policies, carbon credits and energy restrictions is a thinly veiled attempt to dismantle national sovereignty, impoverish populations and enforce compliance with a technocratic elite. True environmental stewardship requires rejecting these fear-based narratives and embracing decentralized, sustainable living – free from the tyranny of globalist agendas.
The truth is clear: CO2 is not the enemy. The real threat comes from
those who weaponize climate fear to justify totalitarian control. By questioning the mainstream narrative and demanding evidence-based policies, we can reclaim both scientific integrity and human freedom.
Watch this video about the book
"Global Warming: A Guide to the Science" by Willie Soon, Sallie Baliunas, Arthur B. Robinson, and Zachary W. Robinson.
This video is from the
BrightLearn channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
Brighteon.ai
Brighteon.com
