The war on meat escalates as globalists propose weaponizing ticks to GENETICALLY ENGINEER humanity with meat ALLERGIES
By ljdevon // 2025-10-21
Copy
 
What if the very food that has sustained human civilization for millennia was suddenly weaponized against you? What if global elites, operating under the guise of saving the planet, decided that you should no longer have the freedom to choose what you eat? This is not the plot of a dystopian novel; it is a terrifying reality being proposed in academic journals and championed by powerful, unelected organizations. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is now sounding the alarm, exposing a chilling agenda to genetically engineer the human population, using nature itself as a weapon to force compliance with a radical, anti-human vision for the future. His warning is echoed by a growing body of bioethicists. The battle for bodily autonomy and food freedom has reached a critical juncture, and the stakes could not be higher. Key points:
  • Governor Ron DeSantis has publicly condemned a proposal to use genetically engineered ticks to spread a meat allergy throughout the human population.
  • The proposal, linked to the World Economic Forum and World Health Organization, is framed as a moral obligation to combat climate change by forcing a reduction in meat consumption.
  • A recent academic paper argues that promoting Alpha-Gal Syndrome, a severe meat allergy, is "strongly pro tanto obligatory" if it prevents a worse world.
  • Alpha-Gal Syndrome is a serious medical condition that can cause life-threatening anaphylaxis and has been linked to fatalities from reactions to common medications.
  • This initiative represents a dangerous merger of biotechnology and behavioral control, threatening fundamental human rights and sovereignty.

The sinister science of weaponized ticks

At the heart of this disturbing proposal is a scientific paper published in the journal Bioethics. Professors Parker Crutchfield and Blake Hereth present what they call the "Convergence Argument." They contend that if an action prevents the world from becoming worse, does not violate rights, and promotes virtue, then it becomes a moral obligation. Their shocking conclusion is that "promoting tickborne AGS is strongly pro tanto obligatory." The mechanism they describe is as ingenious as it is horrifying. The lone star tick naturally carries a sugar molecule called alpha-gal in its saliva. When the tick bites a human, it can transfer this molecule into the bloodstream, triggering an immune response known as Alpha-Gal Syndrome (AGS). This condition makes the individual severely allergic to red meat, with consumption potentially leading to anaphylactic shock. The paper explicitly states that it is now feasible to genetically edit ticks to enhance their capacity to carry and transmit AGS, thereby making the deliberate proliferation of this meat allergy a moral imperative. This is not a fringe idea; it is a calculated argument published in a peer-reviewed journal, giving intellectual cover to a monstrous plan.

The devastating human cost of a manufactured allergy

Proponents of this scheme dismiss AGS as a "nonfatal" inconvenience, a small price to pay for planetary salvation. This characterization is a dangerous and blatant falsehood. Alpha-Gal Syndrome is a devastating diagnosis that fundamentally alters a person's life. Unlike a simple food intolerance, AGS can cause fatal reactions to common, life-saving medications. The cancer drug cetuximab and the anticoagulant heparin contain alpha-gal, and at least 10 deaths have been recorded from such reactions. This is not a gentle nudge toward vegetarianism; it is a deliberate infliction of a lifelong, potentially lethal medical condition upon an unsuspecting public. Kendall Mackintosh, a board-certified nutrition specialist, condemned the proposal, stating, "The suggestion of using ticks or any biological vector to intentionally spread an allergy is beyond unethical. It’s dangerous, unpredictable and medically reckless." To suggest that crippling human health is a virtuous act reveals a profound detachment from basic medical ethics and human compassion.

The globalist playbook for food control

Governor DeSantis correctly identified the source of this anti-meat agenda, linking it directly to the World Economic Forum and the World Health Organization. This is not an isolated academic thought experiment; it is a key component of a broader war on food sovereignty. The WEF has repeatedly called for a global transformation in protein consumption, pushing lab-grown meats and insects while demonizing traditional animal agriculture. In a 2019 video, the WEF suggested limiting humans to just one beef burger per week to "save the planet." Sayer Ji, founder of GreenMedInfo, cuts through the climate rhetoric to expose the true motive. "The war on meat has never been about climate. It’s about control," Ji said. "Meat represents everything the global technocracy fears: decentralized production, nutritional independence and cultural traditions that resist standardization. When people can raise their own food, they’re harder to control." This agenda is about consolidating the entire food supply under a centralized, patented, technology-dependent system owned and controlled by a handful of corporations and their globalist partners. The push for lab-grown meat, which DeSantis outlawed in Florida last year, is the other side of the same coin. It replaces nourishing, whole food with an ultra-processed, patented product, creating total dependence on a corporate-controlled food system. The weaponized tick is simply a more brutal, coercive tool to achieve the same end: stripping humanity of its nutritional independence. This is an attack on human life itself, a transhumanist experiment that treats people as lab rats to be genetically altered for a political agenda. The fight for the future of food is the fight for human freedom. Will we stand with Governor DeSantis and those who defend our right to nourish our bodies with real food, or will we allow global elites to genetically modify our very biology in their quest for total control? The answer will determine whether we remain a free species, sovereign over our own bodies and our own diets. Sources include: ChildrensHealthDefense.org X.com Pubmed.gov
Copy