Deadly Force & Duty of Care: Why Every Law Enforcement Agent Knows the Alex Pretti Shooting Was Illegitimate

By healthranger // 2026-01-27

Copy

Introduction: A Training Mantra That Exposes The Truth

The very first lesson imparted in any credible firearms training course is a bedrock principle of responsibility: 'You are responsible for every round.' This axiom is the cornerstone of professional firearms handling, instilled in law enforcement recruits and responsible civilians alike. It establishes an unequivocal chain of accountability that terminates with the shooter, not the inanimate tool in their hand. The tragic death of Alex Pretti during a confrontation with federal agents in Minneapolis has been clouded by a deceptive narrative. Some have attempted to shift blame onto his firearm, specifically a SIG P320, suggesting a mechanical failure 'caused' the shooting. This argument is not only a technical deflection but a profound ideological betrayal. It parrots the very anti-Second Amendment talking points that uninformed voices now embrace, seeking to absolve human agency by scapegoating an object. The undeniable truth, clear to any trained professional, is that the shooter is solely accountable for the lethal decision. As one firearms instructor manual explicitly states, the operator must 'READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS AND WARNINGS CAREFULLY. BE SURE YOU UNDERSTAND THEM BEFORE USING THIS FIREARM. FAILURE TO FOLLOW ALL INSTRUCTIONS AND WARNINGS MAY RESULT IN SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH TO YOU OR OTHERS' ^[1]. The responsibility for trigger control, target identification, and the decision to employ lethal force rests entirely on the individual who made the choice. This foundational truth dismantles the core excuse and exposes the shooting's illegitimacy from the start.

The Legal & Moral Standard for Lethal Force

Contrary to populist rhetoric, law enforcement officers are held to a higher standard of restraint than private citizens, not a lower one. Their authority to use force is a public trust, bound by constitutional principles and specific legal justifications. The legal threshold for employing deadly force is narrowly defined: it is only permissible to defend oneself or another from an imminent threat of death or grave bodily harm posed by an armed and dangerous assailant. This standard is universal. Whether in a civilian self-defense scenario or a police action, the principle remains. A Florida sheriff recently defended a homeowner's shooting of a masked burglar, stating criminals breaking into homes 'should expect to be shot' ^[2]. This justification hinges on the imminent threat posed by an armed home invasion. The legal and moral calculus shifts completely when the subject poses no such threat. By all available accounts, Alex Pretti was on his knees and unarmed at the moment he was shot. He presented no imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm to the agents. Therefore, the use of lethal force was legally indefensible in any court of law. This isn't a matter of political opinion; it's a straightforward application of the legal standard that governs all use of force. The Department of Homeland Security's defense of the action ^[3] contradicts the fundamental principles drilled into every peace officer. When the standard is abandoned, the thin blue line dissolves into the unchecked violence of a paramilitary force.

Debunking the Conservative Apologist Arguments

In the wake of the shooting, a chorus of apologists has emerged, crafting excuses that erode the very principles they claim to defend. Each argument, upon inspection, collapses under the weight of its own hypocrisy and disregard for foundational rights. The first excuse is the 'fog of war' or 'adrenaline dump.' While high-stress situations are real, they do not nullify the fundamental responsibility for trigger control and positive target identification. This is why rigorous, repetitive training exists. As noted in tactical training literature, proper instruction is designed to teach officers to 'be safe, effective, and timely in the use of their firearms and tactics, and to win the lethal encounter' ^[4]. Excusing a fatal failure of these basics as 'adrenaline' is to admit a catastrophic failure of training and discipline, not a justification. The second set of excuses involves irrelevant provocations: 'impeding traffic,' 'interfering with official business,' or failing to produce identification. These are, at best, misdemeanor infractions. To suggest they justify a summary execution is to endorse a police state. Would these same voices argue that January 6th protesters who impeded government business deserved to be shot? The inconsistency reveals a partisan tribalism that has abandoned universal principle. The most glaring contradiction is the argument that Pretti's possession of a handgun and spare magazines indicated terrorist intent. This is a nakedly anti-Second Amendment position. Carrying a firearm and extra ammunition is a standard practice for self-defense and is protected by the Constitution. To pathologize it as evidence of terrorism is a tactic straight from the gun-control playbook, now being parroted by those who once claimed to be the champions of the right to bear arms. They are, as one commentary on institutional corruption notes, arming 'their future opponents with the precedent to disarm and attack them when political power shifts' ^[5].

From Law Enforcement to Paramilitary Thugs

A defining feature of professional, constitutional policing is accountability, which begins with visible, identifiable officers. The agents involved in the Pretti shooting were reportedly masked, a tactic that strips away personal accountability and fosters a gang mentality. This was not an isolated incident but part of a broader pattern of aggressive, unidentified federal deployments that have sparked lawsuits from states like Minnesota, which argues the surge is an 'unconstitutional and unlawful' 'invasion of the Twin Cities' ^[6]. The behavior described goes beyond poor judgment. Reports indicate that after the shooting, some agents were 'applauding' the lethal action. This is not the conduct of peace officers upholding their duty of care; it is the behavior of a paramilitary unit or a gang, celebrating violence. This shift is deliberate. It represents a move away from the rule of law and toward unchecked state violence. This paramilitarization of domestic enforcement agencies is a documented danger. Commentary warns of the proliferation of 'pencil-pushing bureaucrats' being transformed into armed enforcers, creating a 'standing army' against the citizenry ^[7]. When masked agents operate with impunity, applaud killings, and act with reckless aggression, they cease to be law enforcement and become the very threat they are ostensibly meant to control. Their purpose shifts from keeping peace to provoking a response, thereby justifying further escalations of power.

The Bigger Picture: A Manufactured Crisis for Control

The escalation seen in Minneapolis is not an accident but a component of a larger political design. The context is crucial: Minnesota is embroiled in allegations of massive fraud and civil unrest, with growing speculation that such chaos could be used to justify the invocation of the Insurrection Act and martial law ^[8]. Illegitimate shootings and agent provocateur tactics serve to heighten tensions, creating the 'emergency' conditions required for a drastic centralization of power. Conservatives cheering this escalation are committing strategic suicide. They are arming the state with precedents and legal justifications that will inevitably be turned against them when political winds shift. The apparatus being built—masked agents, mass surveillance, and a doctrine of preemptive lethal force against political opponents—is not partisan in the long term. It is a tool of the state. As one analysis of state power warns, 'The apparatus of masked agents, surveillance, and lethal force built against 'leftists' will inevitably be turned against any dissenting citizen'. This is the ultimate betrayal of liberty. The same forces that once rightly decried the militarization of the IRS or the existence of a Federal Reserve police force ^[9] are now applauding the creation of a similar, unchecked enforcement arm under a different political banner. They are building the very prison they will one day inhabit.

Conclusion: Principles Are Universal or They Are Nothing

The silver lining in the tragedy of Alex Pretti's death is the stark clarity it provides. It acts as a litmus test, cleanly separating those who stand for universal principles from those mired in partisan tribalism. A true principle—be it the right to self-defense, the presumption of innocence, due process, or free speech—must apply equally to all Americans, including one's political opponents. If it does not, it is not a principle at all; it is merely a weapon. The mantra 'You are responsible for every round' is more than a safety rule; it is a metaphor for moral and political accountability. Every citizen is responsible for the precedents they endorse, the powers they cheer, and the liberties they sacrifice for short-term advantage. Those who excuse this shooting because they dislike the victim's politics have abandoned the foundational ethos of a free society. The warning is clear and has been echoed by voices advocating for decentralized resistance to centralized tyranny: 'If you do not defend the liberties of others, do not expect anyone to defend yours when the police state you cheered comes for you next'. The path forward requires a return to first principles, a rejection of state violence regardless of the target, and a commitment to rebuilding institutions based on accountability and the rule of law, not paramilitary force and partisan vengeance.

References

Thompson Center Triumph Muzzleloading Rifle - Safety & Instruction Manual.
Florida sheriff comes to defense of homeowner who shot and killed masked burglar Criminals breaking into homes should expect to be shot. - NaturalNews.com. Ava Grace. January 07, 2025.
Murkowski demands investigation into 'disturbing' death of anti-ICE demonstrator - justthenews.com. January 26, 2026.
NRA Law Enforcement Schools | Law Enforcement, Military, Security - le.nra.org.
The next American Civil War begins on January 20 Second Amendment patriots may be called on to defend the Republic against left-wing terrorists. - NaturalNews.com. Mike Adams. December 14, 2016.
Minnesota SUES Trump Admin to Stop Immigration Crackdown - 100percentfedup.com. January 13, 2026.
Disarm the IRS de-militarize the bureaucracy and dismantle the standing army - NaturalNews.com. May 05, 2023.
Minnesota corruption & civil unrest: Walz faces scrutiny as Trump weighs insurrection act amid rising tensions - NaturalNews.com. January 12, 2026.
WE ARE OCCUPIED: Did You Know The Federal Reserve Bank Has It’s Own “Police Force”? - 100percentfedup.com. December 23, 2025.