It’s clear once more: The 2020 election was stolen from Trump, as new evidence of manipulation surfaces
By jdheyes // 2021-03-08
Copy
 
Back in 2016, Democrats and their sycophants in the media claimed that Donald Trump won the election because he “colluded” with Russia to “steal” it from Hillary Clinton. It was a blatant, fabricated lie, but to this day there are Democrats and Democratic voters who still make the claim, despite a series of congressional investigations and a special counsel probe that failed to turn up a shred of proof.  But in the face of demonstrable evidence as well as a frank admission that the 2020 election was rigged, those same Democrats are looking the other way while their buds in big tech silence everyone who tried to present evidence of it. That said, the evidence hasn’t changed; the 2020 election was rigged, fixed, stolen — however you want to describe it — from President Trump, and now there is even more evidence to prove it. Lifesite News reports:  Statistical experts say they’ve found patterns in 2020 election data that suggest “algorithm manipulation” may have affected absentee votes in multiple states. The findings were initially cited in reports of swing state voting patterns compiled by John Droz, a physicist and founder of Alliance for Wise Energy Decision in North Carolina. Droz described the reports to LifeSiteNews as the work of “a team of statistical experts (PhDs) who expressed an interest to working on this topic of national importance, for free.” Analyzing Michigan’s results, a pair of statisticians working with Droz — Dr. William M. Briggs and Thomas Davis — discovered that absentee vote results for Democratic and Republican candidates appear to “track one another” in a number of counties. Briggs, who once taught at Cornell Medical School, and Davis, a former Michigan State University prof turned IT entrepreneur, said that the pattern they discovered strongly indicates fraudulent activity. But they told LifeSite News that the evidence may never even have been presented to courts. Their analysis, titled, “Irrational MI Absentee Ballot Findings,” features several graphs showing vote tallies for candidates of both major parties in the recent elections based on data obtained from official state of Michigan sources. Both men said that while the state’s high absentee voting by Democrats did not arouse any suspicions, precinct-level patterns did. For instance, they discovered odd correlations between percentages of votes for either of the major parties that were cast by mail or absentee ballot. They cited as an example Ingham County, whose 2016 absentee vote data is “what normal looks like.” Image “Note the irregularities that occur: some precincts are higher for [Republicans] some are higher for [Democrats],” they noted. “More importantly, the difference between the two [Republican minus Democrat] varies widely — from plus to minus. In other words: neither the red line nor the blue line has a discernible pattern.” Meanwhile, the 2020 results definitely do have a “discernible pattern.” Image “Not surprisingly, the percentage of Democratic absentee voters exceeds the percentage of Republican absentee voters in every precinct. What is remarkable (and unbelievable) is that these two independent variables appear to track one another,” the two experts continued. (Related: Situation Update, Feb. 25th – Is FAKE Prez. Biden about to be exposed and removed?) “There is no apparent legitimate explanation for the two absentee lines to be tracking each other like that — other than it being due to a computer algorithm,” they added. A total of 10 counties showed a similar pattern, the two statisticians wrote. “From a statistical perspective these are independent variables — which have no relationship with one another,” Davis said of the absentee vote results for Democrats and Republicans. “Yet, the graphical representation of these values in many cases reveals a clear pattern, even to a casual observer.” “That the same type of pattern is seen across such a wide variety of locations is truly remarkable,” he added. “Algorithmic manipulation of absentee votes remains a plausible explanation.” But we’re all still supposed to disbelieve our eyes and our common sense that the evidence, matched with the fact that Joe Biden couldn’t draw 100 people to a campaign event, led to his ‘historic’ victory in November. BS. This latest analysis just proves how much BS Biden’s ‘victory’ was. See more reporting like this at VoteFraud.news.  Sources include: LifeSiteNews.com NaturalNews.com
Copy