VICE News graphic
So, if British “anti-queer” laws birthed homophobia, you might expect all the countries in white to be Queer Paradises where transgenders frolic freely through the meadows – right? Like, for example, in Iran (which was never colonized by any European power)? How is the LGBTQ+++© community doing there? Or Afghanistan (also never colonized by any European power)? Saudi Arabia? South Korea? Under their theory, the entire resistance among the People of Ghana (and worldwide) to ideological indoctrination is the result of European colonialism. But, when asked at 02:20 about why the native population rejects queer gender ideology, the documentary’s protagonist (one of approximately five transgenders in Ghana who VICE recruited to serve as their sympathy magnet) spills the beans on the true reason:“People are not ready to embrace change. They feel [LGBTQ] is a Western culture and it’s not aligned with our culture.”And, at 4:10, an actual elected leader in Ghana explains her opposition:
“We cannot embrace what, at the end of the day, is completely alien to our culture, to our tradition, to everything we stand for.”So, which is it? Is imported homophobia the prevailing counterforce to LGBTQ+++© acceptance or is resistance to it built on rejection of a forced Western gender-queer ideology? Can both possibly be true? Either way, imagine the racism – robbing an entire nation of its agency by chalking its cultural preferences up to a legacy of European colonialism. As if the local population is merely an object to be acted upon, with no autonomy or authentic indigenous cultural preferences. The activists/colonialists going to work on Ghana can’t get the narrative straight because it’s obviously self-contradictory nonsense. Which makes it all the more confusing for the Third World natives, who (lucky for them) haven’t yet experienced full indoctrination into the Neoliberal Church© orthodoxy. They don’t know what “micro-agressions” or “affirmative consent” or “non-binary” or any of the social justice engineering terms mean. What’s more, the polling (cited above) indicates that they don’t appear to be interested. The British established the first colony in Ghana in 1874 and left in the mid-20th century, ceding to independence movements in the territory. This amounted to roughly 70 years of colonial rule. Which begs key questions:
“You think that we’ll corrupt your kids If our agenda goes unchecked Funny, just this once, you’re correct We’ll convert your children Happens bit by bit Quietly and subtly …We’re coming for them We’re coming for your children …Just like you worried, they’ll change their group of friends. You won’t approve of where they go at night.”Of course, the defense was that the song was intended as satire. On its own, without context, that may be accurate. But this is a smokescreen of plausible deniability; the lyrics match the real-world practice of the targeting of children. Is this “satire” as well?
“Your children are not your children; They are the sons and daughters of Life’s longing for itself. They come through you But they are not from you And though they are with you They belong not to you.”Is the Boston Gay Men’s Chorus right? Do Ghana’s children not belong to her People? Read more at: TheDailyBell.com
Virginia’s new AG fires dozens of left-wing “civil rights division” staffers
By JD Heyes // Share
NASCAR goes gay: Every American sport league is now actively, unashamedly pro-LGBT
By News Editors // Share
TROUBLE FOR KAMALA: Tim Walz now under investigation for ties to CCP
By ethanh // Share
Former Big Tech exec warns of serious dangers linked to wireless technology
By isabelle // Share
Sunlight and clouds, not CO2, responsible for planetary climate changes
By ethanh // Share