“The policies Ernby advocated may well have contributed to the spread of COVID and to the damaging of the public health infrastructure in her own community. Even before this pandemic, she spoke out for measures that would threaten California schoolchildren with exposure to deadly childhood diseases. There were no scientific or medical grounds for her opposition to mandates; there was only political ideology.” The columnist goes on to assert that the media should shine a spotlight on the deaths of people who ask questions about COVID vaccines and other lockdown measures, as if they don’t relentlessly do that anyway. “But mockery is not necessarily the wrong reaction to those who publicly mocked anti-COVID measures and encouraged others to follow suit, before they perished of the disease the dangers of which they belittled,” he adds. Imagine if people who campaigned against mandatory vaccinations mocked the deaths of people who died from vaccine side-effects? They’d be treated as monsters by the media, as should Michael Hiltzik for his disgusting diatribe. Read more at: Summit.newsColumn: Mocking anti-vaxxers' deaths is ghoulish, yes — but necessary https://t.co/ge7NveMjVq
— Michael Hiltzik (@hiltzikm) January 10, 2022
Tom Renz and Emerald Robinson talk about media corruption – Brighteon.TV
By Ramon Tomey // Share
Amnesty International urges Italy not to discriminate against the unvaccinated
By Cassie B. // Share