“This special award reflects the Board’s desire for Mr. Dimon to continue to lead the Firm for a further significant number of years. In making the special award, the Board considered the importance of Mr. Dimon’s continuing, long-term stewardship of the Firm, leadership continuity, and management succession planning amidst a highly competitive landscape for executive leadership talent.”If JPMorgan Chase had a properly functioning Board, and the Justice Department had a properly functioning criminal division, Dimon would have been forced out in 2013 when the U.S. Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations released a 300-page report detailing how the bank had lied to its regulators as it used depositors’ money from its federally-insured bank to gamble in derivatives in London and lose $6.2 billion. The FBI investigated that matter and yet the Justice Department brought no criminal charges. The JPMorgan Board had its second opportunity to fire Dimon when the bank admitted to its first two felony counts in 2014 for its outrageous handling of the business bank account of Ponzi-schemer Bernie Madoff. The Board had its third chance to fire Dimon the very next year when the bank pleaded guilty to its role in a bank cartel (actually called “The Cartel”) that rigged the foreign currency market. Based on the bank’s fourth and fifth felony counts in 2020 and the $50 million bonus to Dimon from the Board 10 months later to keep Dimon at the helm for “a significant number of years,” it’s pretty clear that criminal activity is perceived by the Board of JPMorgan Chase as an accepted business model as long as the stock price keeps going up. (The outside Board members at JPMorgan Chase receive an annual stock award of $250,000 on top of other fees. In 2020, five members of JPMorgan Chase’s Board received over $400,000 in total annual compensation.) The words “independent director” appears 73 times in the most recent proxy statement that JPMorgan Chase filed with the SEC. The bank calls all non-management members of its Board of Directors “independent,” writing in its proxy statement year after year that they “had only immaterial relationships with JPMorgan Chase and accordingly were independent directors.” In October of 2020, we took a close look at those “immaterial” relationships some of the Board members had with the Bank. You can decide for yourself if this is a Board that you would feel comfortable calling “independent.” Read more at: WallStreetOnParade.com
Canadian trucker Freedom Convoy embraces GiveSendGo after GoFundMe censorship
By News Editors // Share
Thomas Renz: People behind COVID vaccines belong in jail
By Nolan Barton // Share
Alex Newman: War advances Deep State objective of one world government
By Nolan Barton // Share
Memphis BLM founder gets 6 YEARS jail time for illegally voting
By Ramon Tomey // Share