A year before that in 2006, The Atlantic published an article in which writer Joshua Green referred to Walz as "a command sergeant major," this being the same false terminology used by Walz himself. While no one is questioning Walz's service, they are questioning his alleged battlefield deployments, which he has repeatedly hawked throughout his political career in order to boost himself. "Lying about one's battlefield deployments for decades for political gain is disqualifying to me, and it shouldn't be a question," is how one X user put it. "It's still on his X profile," wrote another about how the deception continues. (Related: It looks as though the Democrat Party is once again using Muslims to try to steal another election – will they succeed?)Tim Walz wasn’t simply sloppy or inattentive to how others referred to him, he intentionally & purposefully built his entire political identity around “being a retired Command Sergeant Major” — as you can see in this clip from 2007. But he wasn’t. It was all false. Stolen valor! https://t.co/fAcXbleCDZ pic.twitter.com/36fKkQvdov
— Matt Beebe (@TheMattBeebe) August 11, 2024
Overeating driven by emotions resists GLP-1 weight loss drugs, study finds
By willowt // Share
Elon Musk breaks $500 billion net worth barrier, poised to become world's first trillionaire
By bellecarter // Share
Washington weighs Tomahawk transfer to Ukraine, raising Kremlin alarm
By patricklewis // Share
Spain escalates pressure on Israel, blocks U.S. military arms transfers through its bases
By kevinhughes // Share
A call to reclaim your health: "Natural Health Solutions" by the Health Ranger Mike Adams
By kevinhughes // Share
"A.G.E.S. Summit 2025" on BrightU: The minefield of toxins in your kitchen
By jacobthomas // Share