
A year before that in 2006, The Atlantic published an article in which writer Joshua Green referred to Walz as "a command sergeant major," this being the same false terminology used by Walz himself. While no one is questioning Walz's service, they are questioning his alleged battlefield deployments, which he has repeatedly hawked throughout his political career in order to boost himself. "Lying about one's battlefield deployments for decades for political gain is disqualifying to me, and it shouldn't be a question," is how one X user put it. "It's still on his X profile," wrote another about how the deception continues. (Related: It looks as though the Democrat Party is once again using Muslims to try to steal another election – will they succeed?)Tim Walz wasn’t simply sloppy or inattentive to how others referred to him, he intentionally & purposefully built his entire political identity around “being a retired Command Sergeant Major” — as you can see in this clip from 2007. But he wasn’t. It was all false. Stolen valor! https://t.co/fAcXbleCDZ pic.twitter.com/36fKkQvdov
— Matt Beebe (@TheMattBeebe) August 11, 2024
The silent sentinel: Ancient wisdom and modern science converge on kidney health
By willowt // Share
Republicans consider long-term funding extension as shutdown drags Into third week
By bellecarter // Share
The FBI has arrested over 28,000 violent criminals since Trump's return to office
By kevinhughes // Share
U.S. and Israel weigh dividing Gaza, with reconstruction tied to Hamas disarmament
By bellecarter // Share
Moscow and Beijing blast Washington's "counterproductive" sanctions on Russian oil giants
By ramontomeydw // Share
Landmark study exposes AI chatbots as UNETHICAL mental health advisors
By avagrace // Share