U.S. Military EXITS fake "Climate Change" hoax after a DECADE of wasting time, money, manpower and resources
By sdwells // 2025-04-06
Copy
 
  • The U.S. military’s decade-long climate programs, such as the Navy’s costly "Great Green Fleet" biofuel project and Air Force’s reliance on expensive, inefficient Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF), have yielded minimal emissions reductions while wasting billions.
  • The DoD under Secretary Pete Hegseth has abandoned climate mitigation as a priority, dismissing it as non-essential to military readiness.
  • In line with this, programs like electric battlefield vehicles and SAF are being scrapped as impractical and wasteful.
  • Biden’s net-zero mandates push the military toward unrealistic goals (e.g., electrifying tactical vehicles, biofuels), which offer no tactical advantage and face technological barriers (e.g., battery energy density, global fuel availability).
  • While climate adaptation measures (e.g., flood barriers) are pragmatic, attempts to "mitigate" global temperatures through military policies are deemed futile. These efforts ultimately fall under ideological spending with no measurable environmental or strategic benefit.
Thanks to the election of Donald J. Trump, the era of fighting invisible, fake enemies with taxpayer billions is over. We’ve wasted so much time, money, resources and emotions on battling fear, it’s like some science fiction novel that got translated onto the battlefield. Even the U.S. military has been fighting in the idiocy war of the “woke” climate change hoax. No, the glaciers in antarctica aren’t melting. No, the humans on earth won’t burst into flames walking around this summer in the hot sun. And no, the coastal cities around the world are not underwater, though the Democrats, Liberals, and fake news media complex would have us all believe otherwise. Now the military programs that “fight climate change” have been terminated, and to the benefit of mankind, national security, real science, and commonsense logic. Amen.

The insidious globalists and lunatic liberals are losing their minds because Trump doesn’t support their fake “climate change” agenda

The biggest Ponzi scheme ever invented is quickly coming to an end. Even other countries are following suit with Trump and ending the madness and wasted spending of billions of dollars – for nothing. The Biden administration’s push for a net-zero military by 2050 has faced significant setbacks, with costly biofuel experiments, impractical electric vehicle transitions, and a lack of measurable climate impact. Now, under Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the Pentagon is abandoning climate change mitigation, calling it a wasteful distraction from military readiness. For over a decade, the U.S. military pursued aggressive climate programs. The Navy’s Great Green Fleet—launched in 2011 under Secretary Ray Mabus—aimed to power ships with biofuels, but the effort collapsed due to high costs and logistical failures. By 2017, the Navy had spent $57 billion on alternative fuels, yet 99% of its fleet still relied on petroleum. Similarly, the Air Force explored Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) as a low-emission alternative. But SAF remains expensive, scarce, and no more effective than conventional jet fuel in reducing carbon output. Meanwhile, the Army’s Climate Strategy called for electrifying its non-tactical fleet by 2027, despite battlefield charging proving impractical.

"Climate Change Crap" vs. Military Readiness

“The Dept of Defense does not do climate change crap. We do training and warfighting,” Defense Secretary Hegseth declared earlier this month, signaling a dramatic shift from previous administrations. The Pentagon has since cut green programs, redirecting funds toward warfighting capabilities. Even adaptation measures, such as flood barriers and hardened bases, though sensible—have been conflated with climate "mitigation" efforts that lack empirical support. As the Coast Guard Academy removes climate change from its curriculum, the military is refocusing on immediate operational needs rather than long-term environmental targets. Despite billions spent, military climate policies had no discernible effect on global CO2 levels. The Defense Department consumes roughly 4.6 billion gallons of fuel annually, with aircraft responsible for 76% of emissions. Unlike civilian sectors, military operations demand reliability over sustainability, making hydrocarbon alternatives untenable. With the Biden administration’s net-zero ambitions clashing with Pentagon realities, the U.S. military is now prioritizing combat readiness over climate compliance. The era of green experimentation is ending—but the debate over defense priorities is far from over. Check out ClimateAlarmism.news for updates on psychotic billionaires, liberal lunatics, and fake news trying to con us all into giving our money to fake causes that pad the accounts of the most corrupt people on the slowly cooling planet. Sources for this article include: NaturalNews.com BezosEarthFund.org WattsUpWithThat.com
Copy