Medical tyranny, not COVID-19, drove global spikes in excess mortality, researchers reveal
By ljdevon // 2025-06-18
 
The world was brainwashed with a lie—one so colossal it reshaped societies, dismantled freedoms, and left millions dead in its wake. Governments and health authorities insisted that a novel, highly contagious virus was sweeping the globe, necessitating unprecedented lockdowns, forced medical interventions, and the suspension of basic human rights. But what if the real killer wasn’t the virus at all? What if the spikes in excess mortality—the unexplained deaths that surged during the so-called pandemic—were the direct result of medical tyranny, not a viral outbreak? Groundbreaking research from Canadian scientists demolishes the official narrative, exposing how pandemic policies—not SARS-CoV-2—were the driving force behind excess deaths. Their analysis of all-cause mortality data across the U.S. and Europe reveals a chilling pattern: deaths surged in lockstep with government interventions, not viral spread. Ventilators, isolation protocols, and institutional neglect became the true pandemic, disproportionately claiming the lives of the elderly, the poor, and the vulnerable. Key points:
  • Excess mortality spikes occurred simultaneously worldwide, defying the expected patterns of a contagious respiratory virus.
  • Adjacent regions with similar demographics and cross-border traffic saw wildly different death rates, proving policy—not pathogens—was the lethal variable.
  • Poor and minority communities suffered disproportionately, with hospitals and nursing homes becoming death traps under misguided medical protocols.
  • The timing of mortality peaks aligned with government mandates, not viral transmission, exposing the iatrogenic (medically-induced) nature of the crisis.

Geographic anomalies expose the fraud

If COVID-19 were truly a fast-spreading respiratory virus, excess deaths would follow predictable epidemiological patterns—gradual spread from urban hubs to rural areas, with adjacent regions experiencing similar impacts. Instead, researchers found staggering inconsistencies. Take Germany’s western border: densely populated regions in France, Belgium, and the Netherlands saw devastating mortality spikes, while neighboring German areas remained virtually untouched. "The virus would not stop at the border," lead researcher Joseph Hickey told The Defender. "People travel across constantly. The difference had to be policy." The same phenomenon played out in U.S. cities. New York suffered catastrophic losses, while San Francisco—another major international hub—did not. If a novel virus were to blame, why did death rates vary so drastically in cities with comparable demographics, healthcare systems, and travel volumes?

Synchronized death spikes point to policy failures, negative impact of mandates, not pathogens

Perhaps the most damning evidence against the viral narrative is the eerie synchronicity of mortality peaks. Across Europe and the U.S., excess deaths surged almost simultaneously in March-May 2020—immediately after the WHO’s pandemic declaration—despite vast differences in regional infection timelines. In Italy, northwest regions saw mortality rates seven times higher than central areas, yet both peaks occurred at the same time. This defies every known model of viral spread, which predicts staggered outbreaks as infections travel from epicenters to outlying areas. Instead, the data suggests a coordinated trigger: the rollout of deadly medical protocols.

The poor and vulnerable paid the highest price

The cruelty of pandemic policies was not evenly distributed. Researchers found that excess deaths clustered in impoverished communities, where residents relied on underfunded hospitals and institutional care. In New York, the Bronx—home to lower-income, minority populations—endured far higher mortality than affluent Manhattan, despite their proximity. London’s Brent and Westminster boroughs mirrored this disparity. Crowded living conditions alone couldn’t explain the gap; the real culprit was medical mismanagement. Hospitals became death mills, where untested treatments like mechanical ventilation—often administered recklessly—turned manageable illnesses into fatal conditions. Meanwhile, patients were denied family visits, proper nutrition, and early treatment options, accelerating their decline. The evidence is undeniable: what was falsely labeled a "pandemic" was, in reality, a meticulously engineered assault on human freedom, dignity, and health. The staggering excess mortality witnessed across nations was not the result of a deadly virus running rampant—it was the direct consequence of government-imposed medical tyranny, coercive mandates, and systemic deception. When human beings are terrorized into isolation and panic; when livelihoods are destroyed, purpose is stripped away, and financial ruin becomes the norm; when fraudulent testing, forced isolation, and the denial of early treatment turn hospitals into houses of suffering—it becomes clear that the crisis was never about public health. It was about control. When fear-mongering turns mortality into a weapon of mass compliance; when hospitals operate under liability shields while medical errors skyrocket; when effective treatments are suppressed in favor of harmful protocols; when experimental injections are mandated despite their catastrophic failures—the truth emerges: the greatest threat to humanity was not a virus, but the very institutions entrusted to protect it. The lockdowns, the mandates, the psychological warfare—these were the true drivers of excess death. The research proves it. The suffering confirms it. The lies expose it. This was not a pandemic. It was a calculated dismantling of societal resilience, fueled by geopolitical agendas and corporate exploitation. If we fail to recognize the root cause—the medical tyranny that divided, sickened, and oppressed populations—we risk repeating history under even darker circumstances. The pandemic was never about a virus. It was about control—about conditioning populations to accept medical tyranny under the guise of public health. The proof is in the data: excess mortality didn’t follow viral spread; it followed the mandates. From ventilators to lockdowns to vaccine experiments that went awry, the real pandemic was iatrogenic. And until we confront this truth, the architects of this catastrophe will continue to evade accountability—while the victims remain nameless statistics in a fabricated crisis. Sources include: ChildrensHealthDefense.org Preprints.org ChildrensHealthDefense.org