Tesco's Aubergine Katsu Bao Buns RECALLED over allergen labeling issue
By oliviacook // 2025-12-12
Copy
 
  • Tesco pulled its Aubergine Katsu Bao Buns because "milk" wasn't listed on the label – a hidden danger the U.K. Food Standards Agency says can trigger severe reactions within minutes for people with allergies or intolerance to milk or milk constituents.
  • Undeclared allergens now drive more food recalls in the U.S., with 154 products pulled in 2023 alone – proof that mislabeling and cross-contact during processing mean allergens can sneak into foods quietly.
  • Advocacy groups warn that voluntary "may contain" labels are a guessing game: inconsistent, vague and often more confusing than clarifying for families who depend on precision.
  • Researchers argue that grouping allergen details, improving readability by bolding ingredients and using consistent language could turn labels from cluttered fine print into lifesaving tools in real-world shopping conditions.
  • Behind the statistics are real families – millions living with allergies, hospitalizations rising and experts stressing that better labeling is not cosmetic – it's survival.
If you've ever stood in a supermarket aisle, tilting a package to catch the light so you can read a label, you already know that food safety sometimes comes down to a few millimeters of text. A recent recall from a U.K. retailer drives that point home. Tesco pulled its Aubergine Katsu Bao Buns because the product contained milk that was not listed on the label – a detail that sounds small but carries huge stakes. According to the U.K. Food Standards Agency (FSA), leaving "milk" off the label makes the product "a possible health risk" for anyone allergic or intolerant to milk or milk components. Tesco has asked customers who bought the popular buns not to eat them and to return them for a full refund, no receipt needed. It also emphasized that no other Tesco products are affected. The process is familiar, but the broader story behind it is much bigger. Hidden in the background of this one product recall is a broader, international trend. Food scientists at the University of Georgia's Extension Food Science & Technology program report that undeclared allergens are now the number one cause of food recalls in the United States. In 2023 alone, the U.S. logged 154 recalls tied to missing allergen information in food labels – more than those linked to harmful bacteria or physical hazards contamination. Their researchers describe two recurring problems:
  • Mislabeling – the preventable human error. This happens when the wrong package gets the wrong label. Maybe a stack of labels from the previous production run wasn't cleared. Maybe last-minute recipe changes weren't communicated quickly enough (or not at all) to the printing team. Sometimes, it's a simple human oversight; sometimes it becomes a systemic one.
  • Cross-contact – the invisible contamination. This occurs when equipment, conveyor belts, utensils or surfaces aren't cleaned thoroughly between runs. If the cleaning, sanitizing and testing steps are not rigorous, small amounts of allergen may remain behind. For someone with a serious allergy, even "trace amounts" can matter tremendously.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires the nine major allergens – crustacean shellfish, eggs, milk, fish, peanuts, sesame, soybeans, tree nuts and wheat – to be labeled clearly. Sesame was added as the ninth in 2023 under the FASTER Act and regulatory data show that adapting to this update has posed challenges; around eight percent of allergen recalls in 2023 involved undeclared sesame. The presence of rules doesn't guarantee perfection. Even when allergens are mentioned on labels, another communication problem often trips shoppers.

Food labeling issues

These are the "may contain," "processed in a facility with," or "made on shared equipment with" statements in food labels. Advocacy organizations like the Food Allergy Research & Education (FARE) emphasize that Precautionary Allergen Labeling (PAL) statements are voluntary and unregulated in the United States. There is no standard phrasing, no uniform threshold of risk and no consistent reasoning why one company uses them and another does not. Two products might both say "may contain milk," but the other one may carry an additional genuine cross-contact risk. A product that does not display a PAL statement is not guaranteed to be risk-free. FARE's guidance for shoppers underscores practicality:
  • Don't assume a food is safe just because the advisory statement is not there.
  • Don't assume a food is dangerous just because the advisory statement is new.
  • When a label changes, call the manufacturer.
  • Save packaging if you suspect mislabeling – you may be asked to provide it for testing.
A peer-reviewed study published in Clinical & Experimental Allergy offers another piece of the puzzle. Researchers examined almost 300 food labels and found enormous variations in how allergen information was presented. While most brands consistently bold allergens in the ingredients list, other issues get in the way:
  • Allergen warnings weren't always grouped together, requiring consumers to scan different parts of the package.
  • Information order varied widely, making label-reading inconsistent from one product to the next.
  • Decorative or transparent packaging sometimes reduced readability.
  • PAL wording varied not just brand, but sometimes even within a single retailer's private-label lines.
The study suggests solutions that aren't technologically complex but to require commitment: group allergen information in one location, use consistent PAL language, improve printing contrast and explore standardized icons. The researchers note that consumers express strong interest in the use of icons, which can transcend language barriers and make scanning faster.

What shoppers can do today

Experts across government agencies, scientific institutions and consumer advocacy groups agree on simple, effective steps for shoppers"
  • Read the entire ingredients list – not just the bolded print parts. Recipes and suppliers can change quietly.
  • Treat new or missing advisory statements as a reason to pause. When in doubt, reach out to the manufacturer.
  • Keep packaging if you suspect an issue. It may be essential if testing or reporting is needed.
  • Report concerns to regulators. Agencies count on consumer reports to identify problems early.
  • Remember that labeling isn't just red tape. For millions of people, it's a lifeline.
BrightU.AI's Enoch points out that food labels do a lot of heavy lifting in a very little space. They're safety instructions, ingredient lists, allergy alerts and manufacturing clues (best by, use by, etc.) packed into a few tight lines. A single missing word can matter. And for those navigating the world with food allergies – or caring for someone who does – clear, complete labeling is not a courtesy but an essential part of daily life. Watch and learn how to spot hidden allergens on food labels. This video is from the Daily Videos channel on Brighteon.com. Sources include: DailyMail.co.uk Site.Extension.UGA.edu FoodAllergy.org PMC.NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov Brighteon.com
Copy