"The Mad, Mad, Mad World of Climatism": A bold challenge to climate change orthodoxy
- Steve Goreham's book questions the mainstream view of anthropogenic global warming, suggesting that current temperature increases might be part of a natural cycle rather than solely due to human activity.
- Goreham argues that carbon dioxide (CO2) is not just a harmful gas but also essential for life, as it boosts plant growth and food production. He challenges the direct correlation between CO2 levels and global temperatures, pointing to evidence that CO2 increases historically follow temperature rises.
- The book highlights how climate science has been politicized, with dissenting voices often ridiculed and marginalized. Goreham emphasizes the importance of open scientific debate and scrutinizing evidence, referencing the work of realist climate scientists who have faced backlash.
- Goreham criticizes policies like cap-and-trade and renewable energy mandates, arguing they are economically damaging, leading to higher energy costs and reduced economic growth. He advocates for a diverse energy mix that includes hydrocarbons, nuclear and renewables to balance sustainability and economic well-being.
- Goreham urges a shift towards a more rational, evidence-based approach to climate change, acknowledging the limitations of current understanding and the potential benefits of natural climate variability. He emphasizes the importance of individual freedom and choice in shaping energy policy, rather than imposing top-down mandates.
Steve Goreham's book, "
The Mad, Mad, Mad World of Climatism: Mankind and Climate Change Mania," dares to question the very foundations of the prevailing climate narrative. (Related:
“Climate of Corruption”: Unraveling the controversy behind global warming.)
Goreham, a speaker and researcher with a background in engineering and climate science, presents a compelling argument that challenges the mainstream view of anthropogenic global warming. His exploration begins with a fundamental question: Are the current temperature increases truly the result of human activity, or are they part of a natural cycle? Goreham points out that temperatures have been rising by about one degree Celsius every century since the end of the Little Ice Age 350 years ago. This raises the possibility that the current warming trend might be a continuation of this natural cycle rather than a direct consequence of human actions.
One of the central pillars of Goreham's argument is the role of carbon dioxide (CO2) in climate change. While
CO2 is often demonized as the primary driver of global warming, Goreham argues that it is, in fact, an essential component of life on Earth. He highlights the fact that higher levels of CO2 have been shown to increase plant growth and food production, suggesting that the gas's impact on the environment is not entirely negative. Furthermore, Goreham challenges the simplistic correlation between CO2 levels and global temperatures. He cites ice core data indicating that increases in CO2 historically follow temperature rises, not the other way around. This, he argues, suggests that other factors, such as solar activity and ocean cycles, may be more significant drivers of climate change.
Goreham does not shy away from addressing the politicization of climate science. He contends that the debate has been hijacked by ideologues more interested in pushing a political agenda than in pursuing objective truth. This is evident in the way dissenting voices are often ridiculed and marginalized. Goreham references
the work of realist climate scientists, such as Dennis Avery, Bob Carter and Richard Lindzen, who have faced significant backlash for challenging the prevailing narrative. He emphasizes the importance of open scientific debate and the need to question assumptions and scrutinize evidence, regardless of the prevailing consensus.
The economic impact of climate policies is another key theme in Goreham's book. He argues that proposed solutions, such as
cap-and-trade systems and renewable energy mandates, are not only ineffective but also economically damaging. These policies often lead to higher energy costs, reduced economic growth and increased poverty, particularly in developing nations. Goreham advocates for a more sensible approach to energy policy, one that prioritizes economic growth and technological innovation. He believes that by embracing a diverse energy mix, including hydrocarbons, nuclear and renewables, we can achieve a sustainable and prosperous future without sacrificing economic well-being.
So, where do we go from here? Goreham's book calls for a reevaluation of our approach to climate change. He urges us to move beyond the fear and hysteria that have dominated the debate and to adopt a more rational and evidence-based perspective. This means acknowledging the limitations of our current understanding of climate science and recognizing the potential benefits of natural climate variability. Goreham also emphasizes the importance of individual freedom and choice in shaping our energy future. He argues that rather than imposing top-down mandates, we should empower individuals and businesses to make decisions that are best for themselves and the environment.
In conclusion, "The Mad, Mad, Mad World of Climatism" is a thought-provoking and timely book that challenges readers to reconsider their
assumptions about climate change. As Goreham himself states, "The climate debate is not just about science; it's about values, priorities and the kind of world we want to live in." This book serves as a reminder that the path to a sustainable future is not a one-size-fits-all solution but a complex and multifaceted journey that requires careful consideration and open dialogue.
Learn more about the book "
The Mad, Mad, Mad World of Climatism" by watching the video below.
This video is from the
BrightLearn channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
Brighteon.ai
Brighteon.com
