Israel’s war on Iran pushes Muslims to unite, forcing Tehran to acquire nuclear weapons for survival
By ljdevon // 2025-06-18
Copy
 
As Israel rains bombs on Iranian cities, claiming to bring "freedom," the world watches a dangerous escalation that may push Iran toward the very outcome the West claims to fear: a nuclear-armed Islamic Republic. The U.S.-Israeli axis, draped in humanitarian rhetoric, has turned negotiation into a facade for premeditated violence—betraying diplomacy while fueling a cycle of retaliation. Now, Tehran faces a stark choice: submit to endless aggression or secure its survival through the ultimate deterrent. Key points:
  • Israel’s strikes on Iran, justified as "self-defense," are accelerating Tehran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons as the only viable deterrent.
  • The "Samson Option"—Israel’s doctrine of nuclear retaliation—reveals a chilling willingness to collapse global systems if threatened.
  • Historical U.S.-backed coups, chemical warfare, and sanctions have hardened Iran’s resolve, making nuclear arms a matter of national honor.
  • A nuclear Iran could stabilize the Middle East by forcing Israel into cautious engagement, reducing reliance on proxy warfare.
  • If Iran is destroyed, the Middle East may unravel, with Israel targeting nuclear-armed Pakistan next in its expansionist vision.

The myth of Israeli "self-defense"

Israel’s claim that its strikes on Iran are defensive collapses under scrutiny. Russia’s deputy UN envoy Dmitry Polyansky dismissed the logic as "very perverted," a sentiment echoed by nations weary of Tel Aviv’s impunity. Since the 1953 CIA-MI6 coup against Iran’s nationalist Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, the Islamic Republic has faced relentless foreign aggression—from Saddam Hussein’s U.S.-backed chemical attacks in the 1980s to today’s assassinations and cyberwarfare. Netanyahu’s demand that Iranians overthrow their "evil regime" ignores history: no nation humiliated into submission remains pliant. Instead, Tehran’s defiance grows, with millions rallying in the streets, demanding retribution. As Iranian officials warn of plans to "shut down Israel’s war machine," the stage is set for a prolonged conflict that could spiral beyond the Middle East.

The Samson Option: Israel’s nuclear blackmail

Israel’s nuclear monopoly—estimated at 400 warheads—has long shielded it from accountability. But its doctrine goes beyond deterrence. The "Samson Option," named after the biblical figure who destroyed his enemies in mutual annihilation, suggests Israel would trigger global chaos if facing defeat. Former Defense Minister Naftali Bennett hinted at this, warning that critical systems—from pacemakers to air traffic control—could fail if Israel is cornered. Stuxnet, the Israeli-U.S. cyberweapon that sabotaged Iran’s nuclear facilities, offers a glimpse of this strategy. If embedded kill-switches exist in global infrastructure, Israel’s threat isn’t just nuclear—it’s systemic collapse. This ultimatum forces the world to protect Israel or face ruin, a reality that fuels Iran’s desperation for its own deterrent.

Why a nuclear Iran could bring stability

Contrary to Western alarmism, a nuclear-armed Iran might impose restraint. Realist scholar Kenneth Waltz argued in Foreign Affairs that nuclear parity discourages reckless aggression, citing India and Pakistan’s cautious engagements. Without nukes, Iran relies on proxies like Hezbollah—a strategy that invites Israeli strikes. With them, Tehran could negotiate from strength, reducing regional volatility. Saudi Arabia’s potential nuclear ambitions, often cited as a counterargument, are already underway. Reports suggest Pakistani warheads may already be stationed in the Kingdom, rendering non-proliferation fears moot. History shows deterrence works: North Korea’s nuclear status didn’t trigger an arms race in Asia. Instead, it forced diplomacy.

The Zionist endgame: From the Nile to the Euphrates

Israel’s territorial ambitions stretch beyond Iran. Leaked plans from NATO’s Wesley Clark revealed Iran as the last of seven Middle Eastern nations targeted for regime change post-9/11. Zionist ideologues like Avi Lipkin have even called for "purifying Mecca and Medina," exposing theological expansionism. If Iran falls, Pakistan—a nuclear-armed Sunni power—could be next. Yet Pakistan’s covert ties with Israel, dating back to Cold War collusion, highlight the transactional nature of alliances. The Muslim world’s failure to unite against Zionism leaves nations vulnerable to divide-and-conquer tactics. Conclusion: The inevitable nuclear reckoning Israel’s aggression is making the case for a nuclear Iran. Every bomb dropped, every sanction imposed, pushes Tehran closer to the bomb—not as aggression, but as survival. The West’s hypocrisy, allowing Israel’s nuclear arsenal while denying Iran’s right to deterrence, fuels global resentment. Sources include: RT.com NaturalNews.com RT.com
Copy