Iran hardliners weigh nuclear bomb pursuit as regime mobilizes one million troops
By isabelle // 2026-03-27
Copy
 
  • Iran's new hardline leadership is openly debating pursuing nuclear weapons.
  • The regime claims to have mobilized one million troops against a potential U.S. invasion.
  • Iran has rejected a U.S.-backed ceasefire, making a diplomatic deal unlikely.
  • President Trump has temporarily paused threatened attacks on Iranian energy plants.
  • The conflict is escalating global energy costs and risks a major ground war.
Hardline leaders now controlling Iran are openly debating a pursuit of nuclear weapons in a dramatic reversal of long-standing policy as the regime claims to have mobilized one million fighters to repel a potential U.S. ground invasion. This alarming shift comes amid relentless U.S.-Israeli military strikes and a diplomatic impasse, with Tehran rejecting a Washington-backed ceasefire proposal and President Donald Trump extending a deadline for devastating attacks on Iranian energy plants. Following the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, power within Iran has consolidated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. This hardline faction is now considering publicly pursuing a nuclear weapon and withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, according to sources speaking to Reuters. For decades, Iranian leadership maintained that nuclear weapons were forbidden under Islam, but Western intelligence has long asserted the country was secretly enriching uranium for that very purpose. The relentless military campaign appears to have catalyzed this strategic rethink. "The NPT should be suspended," hardline politician Mohammad Javad Larijani stated this week via Iranian state media. "We should form a committee to assess whether the NPT is of any use to us at all." This sentiment echoes in public discourse, with conservative commentator Nasser Torabi saying on state television that the public demands action: "We need to act in order to build a nuclear weapon. Either we build it or we acquire it." Concurrently, Iranian state media claims more than one million troops have been mobilized, ostensibly to defend against a U.S. ground operation aimed at reopening the Strait of Hormuz. The strategic waterway, through which 20% of the world’s oil passes, has been a focal point of the conflict. The regime has reportedly begun reinforcing key areas like Kharg Island with mines against amphibious landings. This military posturing unfolds as diplomacy falters. Tehran has rejected a 15-point U.S. ceasefire plan modeled on a previous Gaza deal, which demanded Iran dismantle nuclear and long-range missile programs, open the Strait of Hormuz, and abandon proxy groups. Instead, Iranian state TV said the regime demands the closure of all U.S. bases in the Gulf, reparations, and an end to Israeli strikes in Lebanon. A Trump official described Iran’s counter-demands as "ridiculous" and "unrealistic," warning that reaching a deal is now more difficult than before the war began. The president, who has threatened a full-scale invasion if diplomacy fails, has granted a brief extension to the escalating pressure campaign. "As per Iranian Government request, please let this statement serve to represent that I am pausing the period of Energy Plant destruction by 10 Days to Monday, April 6, 2026," Trump wrote on Truth Social, adding that "talks are ongoing."

A history of miscalculation

The current crisis carries chilling echoes of past conflicts built on intelligence failures and maximalist demands. The trajectory risks repeating a cycle of escalation where perceived threats, whether fully substantiated or not, justify increasingly severe military action. The Iranian regime’s newfound willingness to flout nuclear taboos suggests it believes it has little left to lose, transforming a regional war into a potential global proliferation crisis.

The human and strategic cost

The human toll continues to mount. The Iranian Red Crescent reports at least 1,900 people killed and 20,000 injured within Iran since the war began. Global markets reel from energy supply disruptions, with the Philippines becoming the first country to declare a state of emergency over soaring fuel prices. U.S. military planners warn that any ground operation would risk significant American casualties, while Iran itself has invoked the specter of another Vietnam, vowing that any boots on the ground would be met with a grinding, unwinnable resistance. With diplomacy stalling, nuclear taboos eroding, and a global energy crisis already rippling from Manila to sub-Saharan Africa, a conflict that began as a regional military campaign is threatening to evolve into something far more dangerous... and far harder to stop. Sources for this article include: DailyMail.co.uk CNN.com AlJazeera.com
Copy